2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11043-010-9114-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical aging behavior of the normal force and torque in polymer glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…will vary as a function of the strain at which stress relaxation is initiated, even though the average segmental relaxation time is not changing; this dependence on strain is discussed below. Related considerations in the determination of a mechanical relaxation time have been discussed previously …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…will vary as a function of the strain at which stress relaxation is initiated, even though the average segmental relaxation time is not changing; this dependence on strain is discussed below. Related considerations in the determination of a mechanical relaxation time have been discussed previously …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In and other references, various authors have discussed and proposed several step rate corrections, but the more or less unanimous conclusion was that the effect was only important in materials with significant contribution of relaxation times similar to (or shorter than) the ramp time. In addition, relative errors affecting the relaxation modulus, Ertrue(ttrue), were generally small, though the same would not necessarily apply to best‐fit KWW parameters, given their extreme sensitivity to only slight changes in the data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relaxation time t r included a correction for the loading time t l following the Zapas–Craft approach: t r = t − t l /2, where t is the time with origin t = 0 at the onset of loading. This correction enabled accounting for the relaxation, which occurred during loading . Tests were carried out both at 30 °C (10, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90% RH) and at 50 °C (50 and 90% RH).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%