2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000162925.26703.3a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical and Biological Characterization of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide- and Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-Labeled Cells

Abstract: The hematopoetic progenitor, mesenchymal fibroblast and epithelial HEP-G2 cell lines accumulated SPIO more efficiently than USPIO indicating SPIO to be better suited for cell labeling. However, the results indicate that there may be an induction of forced cellular iron elimination after incubation with (U)SPIO.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
74
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
8
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results revealed a positive induction within 7 days, demonstrated by staining of cartilage-specific proteogylcans. A mean cellular iron content of 24 pg was found in co-labeled MSC, this finding was similar to reported values for magnetic cell labeling without toxic effects [10,41,43]. Therefore, it was assumed that the co-labeling approach described above was an applicable method to study MSC in-vivo by MRI and to validate their localization by histology.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results revealed a positive induction within 7 days, demonstrated by staining of cartilage-specific proteogylcans. A mean cellular iron content of 24 pg was found in co-labeled MSC, this finding was similar to reported values for magnetic cell labeling without toxic effects [10,41,43]. Therefore, it was assumed that the co-labeling approach described above was an applicable method to study MSC in-vivo by MRI and to validate their localization by histology.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Furthermore, labeling approaches vary in terms of cell incubation and the possible use of transfection agents [9]. All the different magnetic labeling techniques result in a considerable increase of the cellular iron content up to 100 pg per cell [7] compared to a physiological cellular iron content of generally less than 1 pg [10]. The large amount of intracellular iron oxide particles and the use of high-resolution T2*-weighted gradient echo sequences permits cellular MRI techniques to be very sensitive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particles may also penetrate cells by still other mechanisms (Rothen-Rutishauser et al 2006). The efficiency of nanoparticle incorporation is known to depend on size (Rejman et al 2004;Chithrani et al 2006), shape (Chithrani et al 2006), surface charge (Labhasetwar et al 1998;Arbab et al 2003;Oyewumi et al 2004;Sun et al 2005) and surface chemistry (Labhasetwar et al 1998;Holzapfel et al 2006;Lorenz et al 2006;Nativo et al 2008) of the particles.…”
Section: Cellular Uptake Of Fept Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a number of reports described labeling and tracking of cells through the use of SPIO nanoparticles or fluorescent dyes (Soriano et al, 1992;Hill et al, 2003;Kraitchman et al, 2003;Werner et al, 2003;Bos et al, 2004;Kong et al, 2004a,b;Corti et al, 2005;Sun et al, 2005Sun et al, , 2008Ju et al, 2007). Moreover, the small animal in vivo imaging systems permit sensitive and quantitative spatial monitoring of markers in whole animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%