1972
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1972.tb40174.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical and Chemical Characteristics of “Respirable” Coal Mine Dust*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maximal and equivalent inhibition of interferon production occurred with coal particle sizes ranging from <2-0 to 19-1 ,uM. The size of these particles encompasses the range found in respirable coal dust samples, i.e., from 7-1 to less than 10O,uM (Corn et al, 1972). Coal dust having a particle size of approximately 7 0 ,tM and ranging in concentration [from 0-1 to 0-001 g per 3 x 107 cells markedly depressed viral-induction of interferon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Maximal and equivalent inhibition of interferon production occurred with coal particle sizes ranging from <2-0 to 19-1 ,uM. The size of these particles encompasses the range found in respirable coal dust samples, i.e., from 7-1 to less than 10O,uM (Corn et al, 1972). Coal dust having a particle size of approximately 7 0 ,tM and ranging in concentration [from 0-1 to 0-001 g per 3 x 107 cells markedly depressed viral-induction of interferon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The ability to depress viral induction of interferon was dependent on coal dust concentration and on particle size (12). Maximal and equivalent inhibition of interferon production was attained with coal dust particle sizes ranging from <2.0 to 19.1 ,m. The size of these particles encompasses the range found in respirable coal mine dust (6,29). Coal dust particles greater than 19.1 gm did not markedly affect interferon production.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…CWP can even effectively progress among coal workers after exposure removal [1,2,4,108]. The risk of CWP prevalence is associated with RCMD composition, concentration, and exposure duration [4,22,109]. Doney et al [74,110] investigated the mass concentrations of RCMD and RCS using the MSHA database between 1982 and 2017.…”
Section: Rcmd Exposure Limits and Regulations In The Major Coal Producer Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To properly understand the characterization of RCMD, a more detailed depiction of the respirable dust is required. Even now, no fundamental approach to systematically and provisionally classify coal mine dust has been proposed [17,[21][22][23]109,[113][114][115]. Nevertheless, various methods have been used to characterize RCMD, including scanning electron microscopy-energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX or SEM-EDS), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), XRD, inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR) spectroscopy, atomic absorption spectrometry, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) [5,7,9,17,21,109,116-121].…”
Section: Rcmd Characteristics and Characterization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%