2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssas.2014.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical and cooking characteristics of some Indian kidney bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L . ) cultivars

Abstract: Pulses are an essential component of our diet especially in developing world, information on their physical properties is needed for designing the machines, while cooking quality is important for consumer acceptance. Four kidney bean cultivars were evaluated for their composition, physical, cooking and textural properties. Protein, ash and carbohydrate contents varied significantly (P 6 0.05) in the range of 22.3-26.7%, 3.5-3.8% and 62.1-65.9%, respectively. Physical properties determined at 10.0% moisture rev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
52
3
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
13
52
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences were significant ( p ≤ .05) between the two cultivars of the same variety. Results are not comparable with those obtained by Wani, Sogi, Wani, and Gill (), who reported the moisture content of four kidney bean cultivars in the range of 10.0–10.20 g/100 g. Protein content varied significantly ( p ≤ .05) among the different flours, higher in green gram (23.90–25.02 g/100 g) than in kidney beans (18.78–19.80 g/100 g). The ash, fat, and carbohydrate contents of the flours were reported in the range of 3.16–4.25 g/100 g, 1.43–1.85 g/100 g, and 56.46–61.67 g/100 g, respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Differences were significant ( p ≤ .05) between the two cultivars of the same variety. Results are not comparable with those obtained by Wani, Sogi, Wani, and Gill (), who reported the moisture content of four kidney bean cultivars in the range of 10.0–10.20 g/100 g. Protein content varied significantly ( p ≤ .05) among the different flours, higher in green gram (23.90–25.02 g/100 g) than in kidney beans (18.78–19.80 g/100 g). The ash, fat, and carbohydrate contents of the flours were reported in the range of 3.16–4.25 g/100 g, 1.43–1.85 g/100 g, and 56.46–61.67 g/100 g, respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…According to Wani et al 43 in studying different bean varieties, hardness values varied from 9.63 to 28.11 N. As for the cohesiveness, the values found in this study (0.14 to 0.16) were similar to this author, who found a value of 0.15 for the local red bean variety. Values differed for chewiness, since higher values were observed for the variety Guapo Brilhante (0.41 to 1.16 N/mm) compared to those cited by the author (0.35 N/mm).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This hindered bioavailability of the nutrients such as iron due to presence of phytate. Similar cases were reported from other studies [16,17,24,25] where they observed that soaking beans reduced phytate and resulted in improved bioavailability of iron. Cooking beans for a long time at high temperatures can destroy protein [17].…”
Section: Soaking and Fermentationsupporting
confidence: 90%