2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.05.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical and dynamical properties of the main belt triple Asteroid (87) Sylvia

Abstract: We present the analysis of high angular resolution observations of the triple asteroid (87) Sylvia collected with three 8-10 m class telescopes (Keck, VLT, Gemini North) and the Hubble Space Telescope. The moons' mutual orbits were derived individually using a purely Keplerian model. We computed the position of Romulus, the outer moon of the system, at the epoch of a recent stellar occultation which was successfully observed at less than 15 km from our predicted position, within the uncertainty of our model. T… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
11
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a circular orbit, co-planar with S1 is marginally within the range of uncertainty, such a solution results in significantly higher residuals. This configuration of an outer satellite on a circular and equatorial orbit with an inner satellite on an inclined and more eccentric orbit has already been reported for other triple systems: (45) Eugenia, (87) Sylvia, and (130) Elektra Fang et al, 2012;Berthier et al, 2014;Yang et al, 2016;Drummond et al, 2016). Table 1: Orbital elements of the satellites of Camilla, S1 and S2, expressed in EQJ2000, obtained with Genoid: orbital period P, semi-major axis a, eccentricity e, inclination i, longitude of the ascending node Ω, argument of pericenter ω, time of pericenter t p .…”
Section: Orbit Of S2: S/2016 (107)supporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although a circular orbit, co-planar with S1 is marginally within the range of uncertainty, such a solution results in significantly higher residuals. This configuration of an outer satellite on a circular and equatorial orbit with an inner satellite on an inclined and more eccentric orbit has already been reported for other triple systems: (45) Eugenia, (87) Sylvia, and (130) Elektra Fang et al, 2012;Berthier et al, 2014;Yang et al, 2016;Drummond et al, 2016). Table 1: Orbital elements of the satellites of Camilla, S1 and S2, expressed in EQJ2000, obtained with Genoid: orbital period P, semi-major axis a, eccentricity e, inclination i, longitude of the ascending node Ω, argument of pericenter ω, time of pericenter t p .…”
Section: Orbit Of S2: S/2016 (107)supporting
confidence: 81%
“…The reliability of Genoid has been assessed during a stellar occultation by (87) Sylvia and its satellites Romulus and Remus on January 6, 2013: Genoid had been used to predict the position of Romulus before the event, directing observers to locations specifically to target the satellite. Four different observers detected an occultation by Romulus at only 13.5 km off the predicted track (the cross-track uncertainty was 65 km, Berthier et al, 2014).…”
Section: Orbit Determination With Genoidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many images were already used independently in previous shape studies (Marchis et al 2006;Drummond et al 2009;Descamps et al 2009;Merline et al 2013;Hanuš et al 2013b;Berthier et al 2014). In Tab.…”
Section: Keck Disk-resolved Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approach is sensitive to the boundary condition applied when extracting the contour. Shape models of asteroids (22) Kalliope, (87) Sylvia, (93) Minerva, and (216) Kleopatra have been previously derived (Descamps et al 2008;Berthier et al 2014;Marchis et al 2013;Kaasalainen & Viikinkoski 2012). As the first step, we decided to validate our modeling approach on these asteroids -we have similar or even larger optical, disk-resolved and stellar occultation datasets for them.…”
Section: Comparison With Previously Modeled Primariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter results in model that explains different datasets simultaneously rather than being simply scaled, which is a great advantage of multi-dataset inversion. Although limited to a small number of targets, it provides valuable and detailed information about them (Carry et al 2008;Berthier et al 2014;Pajuelo et al 2018;Vernazza et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%