2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2003.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical and mechanical properties of an experimental dental composite based on a new monomer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
56
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
56
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…MDP has been rated as the most promising monomer for chemical bonding to hydroxyapatite of enamel or dentin. Indeed adhesives containing MDP revealed, rather consistently, a favorable adhesive performance in many laboratory and clinical studies, particularly regarding long-term bond durability [32][33][34] . In this regard, the role of functional monomer in bonding to enamel was investigated in a previous study 17) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MDP has been rated as the most promising monomer for chemical bonding to hydroxyapatite of enamel or dentin. Indeed adhesives containing MDP revealed, rather consistently, a favorable adhesive performance in many laboratory and clinical studies, particularly regarding long-term bond durability [32][33][34] . In this regard, the role of functional monomer in bonding to enamel was investigated in a previous study 17) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a large range of available resin-composites, generalisation about their behaviour and performance should be made d e n t a l m a t e r i a l s x x x ( 2 0 1 6 ) xxx-xxx or collectively, determine the longevity of the restoration [1][2][3][4][5][6]. From a material aspect, the performance of the resincomposite restoration depends on several factors including the monomer system, the filler type, filler loading and the extent of cure [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Degradation of fillers could also be a potential problem regarding durability and marginal integrity as it may cause de-bonding from the material [17][18][19]. Clinical performance of resin-composite materials is determined by their mechanical properties including their fracture toughness, flexural strength, compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, surface hardness and wear resistance [5,20]. Failure of resincomposite restorations is commonly represented by fracture of the restoration, tooth fracture, marginal fracture, discolorations, marginal staining and secondary caries [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The long-term performance of a composite resin depends on its properties, especially its resistance and durability in the oral cavity. Factors that vary from patient to patient, including masticatory forces, occlusal habits, dietary composition, fluctuations in temperature, bacterial products, and salivary enzymes, can impact this durability (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%