2010
DOI: 10.5658/wood.2010.38.1.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical and Mechanical Properties of Heat-treated Domestic Yellow Poplar

Abstract: Recently, yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera L.) is getting attention in Korea due to the fast growing and high yield and quality of lumber. But, it is thought that the color difference between heartwood and sapwood may restrict the practical use of it. This study was aimed to enhance the

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, it was difficult to determine the difference of anatomical features in the surface pore morphology of the cross section by heat treatment in yellow poplar, similar to the findings in Kim et al [24].…”
Section: Results Of Morphology Observationsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In this study, it was difficult to determine the difference of anatomical features in the surface pore morphology of the cross section by heat treatment in yellow poplar, similar to the findings in Kim et al [24].…”
Section: Results Of Morphology Observationsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The average ring width of Q. variabilis is significantly smaller than in Q. suber cork (0.82 vs. 2.06 mm), and each ring has two to six latecork cells representing 14% of the ring width (Kim, 1993;Miranda et al, 2013;Ferreira et al, 2016a). Prism height in the earlycork cells of the reproduction cork of Q. variabilis is smaller than in Q. suber (23 vs. 30-40 µm, Table 2).…”
Section: Cork Cellular Structurementioning
confidence: 91%
“…The solid fraction in earlycork is, therefore, higher in the Chinese cork than in Q. suber cork (13 vs. 8-9%) (Miranda et al, 2013;Ferreira et al, 2016a). Consequently, Q. variabilis cork has higher density than Q. suber, what constitutes a disadvantage as an insulating material (Kim, 1993;Miranda et al, 2013). Another difference between these two corks is the appearance of the cell wall: the lumen side of the cork surface of Q. variabilis is rough with deposits of several dimensions, while in Q. suber, it is smooth and with only occasional deposits (Miranda et al, 2013).…”
Section: Cork Cellular Structurementioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations