1989
DOI: 10.1021/ba-1990-0225.ch004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical and Mechanical Properties of Archaeological Wood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected for archaeological wood [2,27], deterioration of the Oseberg oak is particularly obvious from the strong degradation of hemicelluloses. This might be explained by a selective deterioration of non-crystalline carbohydrates in the total wood matrix relative to (crystalline) cellulose and lignin, as expected for degradation due to bacterial erosion [2].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…As expected for archaeological wood [2,27], deterioration of the Oseberg oak is particularly obvious from the strong degradation of hemicelluloses. This might be explained by a selective deterioration of non-crystalline carbohydrates in the total wood matrix relative to (crystalline) cellulose and lignin, as expected for degradation due to bacterial erosion [2].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Wood was then oven dried for 24 hours at 60°C and then reweighed to the 100 th of a gram. Basic conventional density (Schniewind 1990) was calculated as oven-dry weight (g) divided by wet volume (cm 3 ). All references to wood density in this article are to the basic conventional density of wood.…”
Section: Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of waterlogged archaeological wood, degradation mechanisms are of interest. Previous studies on compressive mechanical properties of waterlogged archaeological wood of different origins (Bednar and Fengel 1974;Kommert 1986;Kú dela and Reinprecht 1990;Schniewind 1990) showed that a significant reduction in strength parallel to the grain is involved, although the woods were often significantly older and more degraded than the Vasa oak. Instead, degradation in water is caused by bacteria (Blanchette et al 1991;Bjö rdal et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schniewind (1990) reviewed the physical and mechanical properties of several types of archaeological wood and found that, in general, ancient waterlogged wood absorbs more moisture than recent oak, even though the hygroscopic hemicelluloses are degraded. Schniewind (1990) reviewed the physical and mechanical properties of several types of archaeological wood and found that, in general, ancient waterlogged wood absorbs more moisture than recent oak, even though the hygroscopic hemicelluloses are degraded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%