1982
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330250511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical anthropological approaches to aging

Abstract: The field of gerontology is remarkably diverse; yet there has been relatively little investigation of physical anthropological issues in aging research. This review explores gerontologic topics of actual andlor potential interest to physical anthropologists. The evolution of aging presents a theoretical dilemma in that postreproductively expressed traits may be outside the influence of natural selection. The physiological changes of aging comprise a diversified mosaic of physical deterioration as would be expe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Senescence is defined by changes that occur primarily in the postreproductive period in humans (around 50 years of age or more; Fedigan and Pavelka, 2001), which overall reduce the functional capacities of the organism and tissues in the decades after menopause (Borkan et al, 1982;Bogin, 2001). Although nonhuman primates maintain their reproductive activity almost until their death (Pavelka and Fedigan, 1999), physical aging advances from young adulthood throughout adult life (Hamada and Yamamoto, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Senescence is defined by changes that occur primarily in the postreproductive period in humans (around 50 years of age or more; Fedigan and Pavelka, 2001), which overall reduce the functional capacities of the organism and tissues in the decades after menopause (Borkan et al, 1982;Bogin, 2001). Although nonhuman primates maintain their reproductive activity almost until their death (Pavelka and Fedigan, 1999), physical aging advances from young adulthood throughout adult life (Hamada and Yamamoto, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study on metacarpals using the Spitafields collection at the Museum of Natural History, London, also displayed significant dimorphism (Sulzmann et al, 2008). The assessment of sexual dimorphism remains an essential aspect of many disciplines, such as: (1) forensics, where the concern with skeletal identification includes sexing (Snow, 1982;Iscan, 1988); (2) archeology, where sexing of skeletal materials is essential to see if differences in sexual dimorphism exist between modern humans and ancestral populations (Frayer, 1980); (3) primatology, where sex differences are diverse and complex in character, and whether humans reflect any residual elements of primate sexual dimorphism; (4) paleoanthropology, the identification of sex can be critical in making taxonomic and phylogenetic decisions, often rendered uncertain because of sampling and the fragmentary nature of fossil materials (Armelagos and van Gerven, 1980;Brace and Ryan, 1980); (5) growth and development, to characterize differences before and after puberty, and to see how sex differences affect body build and performance; (6) orthodontics, where sex differences during growth may potentially influence treatment practices; (7) gerontology, with the search for underlying mechanisms that may lead to sexual differences in bone loss with aging (Borkan et al, 1982;Crews, 1993); (8) nutrition, to establish whether dimorphic differences are affected by diet and malnutrition (Garn, 1975;Robson, 1975); (9) medicine, to see whether response to disease is, in some cases, sex influenced and whether sex differences have an effect on medical treatment modalities (Robinow, 1982); etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimation of the degree of skeletal mineralization, depending on an individual's living conditions, diet and a type of body build, is a relatively new research aspect also in physical anthropology (Garn et al, 1967(Garn et al, , 1969Smith 1967;Newton-John & Morgan, 1970;Martin et al, 1980Martin et al, , 1985Borkan et al, 1982;Stini, 1990aStini, ,b, 1994Nelson et al, 1991;Prado et al, 1992;Stini et al, 1992;Crews, 1993Crews, , 1997.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%