Physical assessment by Japanese community hospital nurses compared to that performed overseas: A cross‐sectional study

Abstract

Background Japanese nurses may not be adequately trained to perform physical assessments compared to nurses overseas due to differences in accessibility to education; currently, research investigating this discrepancy is limited. This study investigated the current performance levels of Japanese community nurses in physical assessments and compared their performance to that of nurses overseas. Methods In this cross‐sectional study, we examined the practical application of physical assessments conducted by nurses at a Japanese community hospital. We used a questionnaire based on one used in a similar prior study conducted overseas. The results were also compared with the overseas data. A chi‐squared test and analysis of variance were used to analyze the variables in each question. Results We distributed the questionnaires to 171 nurses working in the hospital. The return rate was 97.6% (167 out of 171). There was no significant difference in the methods used to perform a physical assessment based on the number of years of experience. Compared to nurses overseas, Japanese community hospital nurses differed in one area of assessment: A physical assessment of the chest was more likely conducted via auscultation rather than inspection. Conclusions When Japanese community hospital nurses performed a physical assessment of patients, auscultation was more frequently implemented than inspection. This approach contrasts with nurses overseas, who were more likely to use inspection when performing physical assessment. Japanese community nurses should improve their skills related to inspection, as inspection is an important process in the recognition of early stages of emergency.

Nurses’ Contributions in Rural Family Medicine Education: A Mixed-Method Approach

“…The nurse-to-patient ratios were 1:10 for acute care, 1:13 for comprehensive care, 1:15 for rehabilitation, and 1:25 for chronic care. The hospital had 27 physicians, 197 nurses, 7 pharmacists, 15 clinical technicians, 37 therapists, 4 nutritionists, and 34 clerks [ 27 ].…”

Effectiveness and Challenges in Local Self-Governance: Multifunctional Autonomy in Japan

“…Its total land area measures 553.1 km 2 , which accounts for 8.3% of Shimane Prefecture, most of which is covered by forest. A survey conducted in 2017 revealed that the total population of Unnan City was 38,882 (18,720 men and 20,162 women), with 37.82% being over 65 years of age [ 19 ]. Unnan City was the first city that applied LSG to communities in Japan.…”

The Implementation of a Clinical Ladder in Rural Japanese Nursing Education: Effectiveness and Challenges

“…The city has 16 clinics, 12 homecare stations, three visiting nurse stations, and one public hospital [ 16 ]. When the study was conducted in 2018, Unnan City Hospital had 281 care beds, 27 physicians, 197 nurses, seven pharmacists, 15 clinical technicians, 37 therapists, four nutritionists, and 34 clerks [ 12 ].…”

“…Although the study ensured the reliability and validity of the UNNAN ladder, there was no correlation between years of experience and age in nursing practice ability, which suggested that independent self-improvement may not lead to an improvement in the nursing practice ability. In addition, in the research on the community hospital’s nurses’ physical skills assessment, clinical experience alone did not appear to improve their knowledge and skills [ 12 ].…”