2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical attractiveness of face and body as indicators of physical fitness in men

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
79
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
7
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…large jaws and pronounced brows) and bodily (i.e. broad shoulders, narrow hips, tallness) traits positively correlate with health status, physical strength and self-reported mating success (Fink et al, 2007;Gallup et al, 2007;Hönekopp et al, 2007;La Batide-Alanore et al, 2003;Prokop and Fedor, 2013;Samson et al, 2000;Smith et al, 2000;Thornhill and Gangestad, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…large jaws and pronounced brows) and bodily (i.e. broad shoulders, narrow hips, tallness) traits positively correlate with health status, physical strength and self-reported mating success (Fink et al, 2007;Gallup et al, 2007;Hönekopp et al, 2007;La Batide-Alanore et al, 2003;Prokop and Fedor, 2013;Samson et al, 2000;Smith et al, 2000;Thornhill and Gangestad, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other evidence of women's preferences for higher WHRs has been reported by SINGH (1995) who showed that women prefer men with higher, 0.9-1.0, WHRs over more feminine WHRs and find them most attractive in "normal" weight conditions. Moreover, men's bodily physical attractiveness has been linked to physical fitness (HÖNEKOPP et al 2007); more masculine men rate themselves as sexier and men have been found, cross-culturally, to desire having a masculine physique ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thornhill and Grammer (1999) found correlations between independent ratings of attractiveness in women's bodies and faces, suggesting the two domains act as a single ornament of quality, though the correlations were relatively low (face and frontal view of body, r = .30; face and back view of body, r = .33). Conversely, Peters, Rhodes, and Simmons (2007) found that face and body attractiveness did not interact in judgments of overall attractiveness, and Hönekopp, Rudolph, Beier, Liebert, and Müller (2007) found men's physical fitness correlates with body attractiveness, but not face attractiveness. These results indicate that faces and bodies have separate cues to attractiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%