2015
DOI: 10.1002/crat.201500040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical boundaries within aggregates – differences between amorphous, para‐crystalline, and crystalline Structures

Abstract: The structural properties of finely divided inorganic materials such as metal and metalloid oxides, silicates or carbonates of both synthetic and natural origin are compared by means of electron microscopy and tomography. The structure of the outer surfaces of various compact or compacted agglomerates may suggest some striking similarities between various amorphous silica on the one hand and crystalline titania and alumina on the other however the details of the interior fine structure are completely different… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
44
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The branching of carbon black was still pronounced while the silica clusters had a more grape like shape. This finding is in accordance with what Albers et al [40] claimed that carbon black possesses a more open fractal structure in comparison to a denser structure of silica. For a quantitative analysis, approximately 2000 primary particles were evaluated and the average diameters of carbon black and silica were calculated in accordance to ASTM D3849 [41] (Table 5).…”
Section: Structural Differences By Means Of Transmission Electron Micsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The branching of carbon black was still pronounced while the silica clusters had a more grape like shape. This finding is in accordance with what Albers et al [40] claimed that carbon black possesses a more open fractal structure in comparison to a denser structure of silica. For a quantitative analysis, approximately 2000 primary particles were evaluated and the average diameters of carbon black and silica were calculated in accordance to ASTM D3849 [41] (Table 5).…”
Section: Structural Differences By Means Of Transmission Electron Micsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…All primary particles have been fused together to form the three-dimensional aggregates. No inner boundaries are visible within SAS aggregates (Albers et al 2015), see Fig. 2.
Fig.
…”
Section: E 551 Particle Morphology and Sizementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Coexisting nano-and micro-scale heterogeneities have been achieved in designed nanostructured thermoelectrics [67]. Only in aggregate nanomaterials [68], such as aerogels, xerogels, pyrogenic silica and carbon, structural data [69] indicate a hierarchy of structural organization, named "multilevel structure" over length scales covering about 5 orders of magnitude from ~nm sized "primary particles" to ~100 m sized "agglomerates". Even in this case, however, self-similar, fractal structure spans at most 2 orders of magnitude between the primary particle size (~nm) and the aggregate correlation length (~ 100 nm) [70].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%