2018
DOI: 10.1190/geo2018-0035.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical bounds on C13 and δ for organic mudrocks

Abstract: We have used a reliable, updated database of ultrasonic measurements on organic mudrocks that contains components {C ij } of the transversely isotropic elastic tensor, and hence the Thomsen's anisotropy parameters ε and δ, to establish a more useful upper bound of feasible values for C 13 , and hence δ in unconventional mudrock reservoirs than that introduced earlier. The new upper bound δ max ¼ ε is consistent with elliptical anisotropy and represents a much better constraint for these mudrocks. We derive the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2016) gave the physical constrains for a specified type of TI medium which is stiffer along the bedding/layering than the symmetry axis, based on the relationships among Poisson's ratios. Chichinina and Vernik (2018) further tighten the upper bound of C 13 from Postma's inequality applicable to a thin‐layered effective medium composed of kerogen and inorganic phase. The impact of measurement frequency should also be noted.…”
Section: Model Versus Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2016) gave the physical constrains for a specified type of TI medium which is stiffer along the bedding/layering than the symmetry axis, based on the relationships among Poisson's ratios. Chichinina and Vernik (2018) further tighten the upper bound of C 13 from Postma's inequality applicable to a thin‐layered effective medium composed of kerogen and inorganic phase. The impact of measurement frequency should also be noted.…”
Section: Model Versus Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For ultrasonic velocities measurements, the accuracy of the calculated anisotropy parameter δ depends on the accuracy of the measurements of the P ‐wave velocity propagating at an oblique angle to the bedding‐normal symmetry axis (e.g., Chichinina & Vernik, 2018; Dellinger & Vernik, 1994; Yan et al., 2018). The confusion between the group and phase velocities arises when relatively large transducers are used.…”
Section: Model Versus Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%