1980
DOI: 10.1017/s0074180900066766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Characteristics of Cometary Dust from Optical Studies

Abstract: Observations of the scattered sunlight and thermal emission from cometary dust provide information on the composition and dominant size of the dust. The observations will be summarized here and compared to theoretical models for dielectric and absorbing materials, with emphasis on the thermal emission. The compatibility of the optical data with the size distribution derived from dynamical studies is discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Horányi and Mendis [1991] considered this as a possible explanation of the detection of very small grains by Vega 1 and Vega 2 spacecraft (inbound) at distances as large as 2.5 10 5 and 3.2 10 5 km, respectively, from the nucleus of comet Halley in 1986. These authors also pointed out that, while the precise optical properties of cometary dust grains remain unknown, even if they were absorbing (e.g., dirty silicates) as deduced from infrared thermal emissions from several comets [Hanner, 1980], the excursion of even the very small grains (a = 0.05m) in the directions of the encounters were expected to be considerably less than 10 5 km.…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Of Charged Dust In the Cometary Environmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Horányi and Mendis [1991] considered this as a possible explanation of the detection of very small grains by Vega 1 and Vega 2 spacecraft (inbound) at distances as large as 2.5 10 5 and 3.2 10 5 km, respectively, from the nucleus of comet Halley in 1986. These authors also pointed out that, while the precise optical properties of cometary dust grains remain unknown, even if they were absorbing (e.g., dirty silicates) as deduced from infrared thermal emissions from several comets [Hanner, 1980], the excursion of even the very small grains (a = 0.05m) in the directions of the encounters were expected to be considerably less than 10 5 km.…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Of Charged Dust In the Cometary Environmentioning
confidence: 99%