2011
DOI: 10.3390/membranes2010001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Characterization of Mouse Deep Vein Thrombosis Derived Microparticles by Differential Filtration with Nanopore Filters

Abstract: With the objective of making advancements in the area of pro-thrombotic microparticle characterization in cardiovascular biology, we present a novel method to separate blood circulating microparticles using a membrane-based, nanopore filtration system. In this qualitative study, electron microscopy observations of these pro-thrombotic mouse microparticles, as well as mouse platelets and leukocytes obtained using a mouse inferior vena cava ligation model of deep-vein thrombosis are presented. In particular, we … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We suppose that not‐identified particles correspond to a larger MPs aggregates or some other plasma constituents. In particular, such aggregates were previously detected by other methods, such as confocal and electron microscopy . The FSC versus true MP diameters ( d or d ev ) are separately shown in the inset in Figure A.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…We suppose that not‐identified particles correspond to a larger MPs aggregates or some other plasma constituents. In particular, such aggregates were previously detected by other methods, such as confocal and electron microscopy . The FSC versus true MP diameters ( d or d ev ) are separately shown in the inset in Figure A.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…In order to analyze EVs, researchers have utilized various methods, including transmission electron microscopy 17 , scanning electron microscopy 18,19 , atomic force microscopy, dynamic light scattering 20,21 and western blotting 22,23 . While FCM is the method of choice for many researchers 9,[24][25][26] due to its high throughput capabilities, analysis of EVs using FCM has been notoriously difficult due to their size and lack of discrete positive populations [27][28][29][30][31][32] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of methods have been used to analyze EVs, including scanning electron microscopy (39,40), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (41), atomic force microscopy and dynamic light scattering (42)(43)(44)(45), and western blotting (46,47). Clinically, flow cytometry (FCM) is the most commonly used method for analyzing EVs in blood (5,(48)(49)(50); however, accurate characterization of EVs remains challenging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%