1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1992.tb05888.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical characterization of the pore forming cytolysine fromGardnerella vaginalis

Abstract: The cytolytic toxin (CTox) produced by Gardnerella vaginalis is able to form voltage‐dependent cationic channels when incorporated in lipid membranes (Moran et al, 1991) FEBS Lett. 283, 317–320). Osmotic protection experiments show that toxin incorporated in human erythrocytes forms pores between 18 Å and 28 Å in diameter. A hypothesis of pore formation as a primary event to produce cytolysis is proposed. The CTox activity increases when cells are depolarized by increasing the extracellular K+ concentration, p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the equivalent diameter of pores formed by Eiseniapore, experiments were performed using sheep erythrocytes as described previously [50,51]. Sheep erythrocytes (2%) were suspended in NaCl/P i containing, at a concentration of 30 m m , one of the following osmotic protectors (the effective molecular diameters are given in parentheses): sucrose (0.9 nm), raffinose (1.3 nm), dextran 4 (3 nm), inulin (3.5 nm), poly(ethylene glycol) 4000 (4 nm) and poly(ethylene glycol) 6000 (5 nm).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the equivalent diameter of pores formed by Eiseniapore, experiments were performed using sheep erythrocytes as described previously [50,51]. Sheep erythrocytes (2%) were suspended in NaCl/P i containing, at a concentration of 30 m m , one of the following osmotic protectors (the effective molecular diameters are given in parentheses): sucrose (0.9 nm), raffinose (1.3 nm), dextran 4 (3 nm), inulin (3.5 nm), poly(ethylene glycol) 4000 (4 nm) and poly(ethylene glycol) 6000 (5 nm).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%