Physical, Consumer, and Social Aspects of Measuring the Food Environment Among Diverse Low-Income Populations

Abstract

Obesity and other diet-related chronic diseases are directly related to the food environment. We describe how to better assess the food environment in specific ethnic minority settings for designing and implementing interventions, based on a review of our previous work on the food environment in American Indian reservations, Canadian First Nations reserves, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and inner-city Baltimore. The types of food stores available within each setting and the range of healthy foods available varied greatly across these geographic regions. In all settings, proximity to food stores/supermarkets, cost, and limited availability of healthful foods were common features, which limited access to health-promoting food options. Features specific to each population should be considered in an assessment of the food environment, including physical (e.g., openness of stores, mix of types of food sources); consumer (e.g., adequacy of the food supply, seasonal factors); and social (e.g., inter-household food sharing, perceptions of food quality, language differences) aspects. The food environments common in low-income ethnic subpopulations require special focus and consideration due to the vulnerability of the populations and to specific and unique aspects of each setting.

Access to Healthful Foods among an Urban Food Insecure Population: Perceptions versus Reality

“…Future qualitative research is warranted to investigate the spatial boundaries community members use to define their local food environment. 32 Finally, while all of the participants shopped at the Boys and Girls Club farmers' markets, we do not know where they purchased the majority of their foodstuffs. Thus, we do not know if the local food environment is the only food access point or if participants travel to other environments to gain access to healthier foods.…”

Community Food Security via Urban Agriculture: Understanding People, Place, Economy, and Accessibility from a Food Justice Perspective

“…As a subversive movement, the practice of UA generally increases social capital, civic involvement, community efficacy, and empowerment (Armstrong, 2000;Ferris, Norman, & Sempik, 2001;Gittelsohn & Sharma, 2009;Teig et al, 2009). In addition, studies have identified public participation as a crucial component of the food security planning process (Jacobsen, Pruitt-Chapin, & Rugeley, 2009;McCullum, Desjardins, Kraak, Ladipo, & Costello, 2005;Vasquez, Lanza, Hennessey-Lavery, Facente, Halpin, & Minkler, 2007).…”

Perceived impact and feasibility of strategies to improve access to healthy foods in Washington State, USA

“…Access to healthy foods has many dimensions including physical access (having food in geographic proximity given transportation options), economic access (having sufficient resources to pay for food), nutritional access (having access to food that is of good nutritional value) and cultural access (having food that is culturally appropriate) (3)(4)(5) .…”