2006
DOI: 10.1144/gsl.mem.2006.032.01.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical differences in the deep lithosphere of Northern and Central Europe

Abstract: A number of large-scale integrated studies, including the TOR and POLONAISE'97 projects, with an emphasis on seismic methods, have been used to elucidate the southwestern boundary (suture zone) between the East European Craton and the Phanerozoic terranes of Western Europe. Results indicate that a thick slab of mantle lithosphere below the craton thins southwestwards beneath the Trans-European Suture Zone and is not seen south of the Variscan front. The thinning is not gradual, but is interrupted by at least t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For temporary passive experiments, this is even bigger problem, due to the limited number of events. Usually during 1 year of a campaign, only about few tens of good quality records, with magnitude M≥5.5, are collected Gregersen et al 2006;Wilde-Piórko et al 2008 (2005) and Geissler et al (2008) differ only by about ±1 km; however, in other regions, differences can reach more than ±5 km, as is the case for Greenland (Dahl-Jensen et al 2003;Kumar et al 2007). & In seismic refraction and wide angle reflection method observed PmP waves are weak for weak contrast at the Moho (gradient Moho zone).…”
Section: Discussion Of the Deviations Uncertainties And Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For temporary passive experiments, this is even bigger problem, due to the limited number of events. Usually during 1 year of a campaign, only about few tens of good quality records, with magnitude M≥5.5, are collected Gregersen et al 2006;Wilde-Piórko et al 2008 (2005) and Geissler et al (2008) differ only by about ±1 km; however, in other regions, differences can reach more than ±5 km, as is the case for Greenland (Dahl-Jensen et al 2003;Kumar et al 2007). & In seismic refraction and wide angle reflection method observed PmP waves are weak for weak contrast at the Moho (gradient Moho zone).…”
Section: Discussion Of the Deviations Uncertainties And Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This general observation applies to the study area where the lithosphere is significantly thinner and Moho significantly shallower under the Norwegian–Danish Basin than under the South Swedish Dome and the Southern Scandes (e.g. Cloetingh et al , 2006; Gregersen et al , 2006). The large amplitude of the late Neogene tilting of the sedimentary sequences away from Scandinavia cannot be accounted for by intra‐plate stress variations, but is consistent with a dynamic topographic response to movements within the upper mantle (Stoker et al , 2005).…”
Section: Synchronous Cenozoic Exhumation Episodes Onshore and Offshorementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing data on experimentally studied lower crustal and mantle composition and 3-D structure derived from xenolith data, lithospheric thermal models Hieronymus et al, 2007) and seismic studies (Bruneton et al, 2004;Sandoval et al, 2004;Yliniemi et al, 2004;Hjelt et al, 2006;Pedersen et al, 2006;Plomerova et al, 2006;Gregersen et al, 2006;Janik et al, 2007;Olsson et al, 2007) should be utilized for forward rheological modelling of the lithosphere and for testing of dynamic uplift models. The presence and volume of fluids in the upper mantle and the influence of fluids on the mantle rheology is an open question.…”
Section: Evidence From Geophysical Observations Of Lithosphere Structurementioning
confidence: 99%