Physical disability - a psychosocial approach (2nd ed.).

Wright, Beatrice A.

doi:10.1037/10589-000

Cited by 710 publications

(900 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

851

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…13 The general adjustment to disability appears to be conditioned by changes in living attitudes. 21 High HRQL scores and good psychosocial outcome suggest a successful adjustment process which may have been caused by changes in personal living attitudes.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of health-related quality of life in three subgroups of spinal cord injury patients

et al. 1998

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Health-related quality of life (HRQL) was evaluated in three subgroups of spinal cord injury (SCI) patients: (1) persons who had sustained a pediatric SCI (mean time from injury 20 years, age at injury 11.3 years, n=36), (2) newly injured patients at the beginning of acute rehabilitation (mean age 35.3 years, n=31), and (3) patients with a chronic SCI (mean time from injury 4.8 years, mean age at injury 35.2 years, n=34).All the patients were clinically examined and structurally interviewed with a list of questions dealing with details of anamnestic information about injury, its treatment, possible complications and persons past and present psycho-social condition. HRQL was assessed by a generic ®fteen-dimensional self-administered instrument (15D). The relative importance of the 15D dimensions and an overall judgement of health status were measured by a 0±100 visual analogue scale.Average importance weights of the dimensions of moving and working di ered signi®cantly in the three subgroups. Patients with pediatric SCI assigned the lowest importance for moving. The newly injured patients highly valued working capability.The HRQL scores of the patients who had sustained their injury in childhood were signi®cantly higher than those of the newly injured patients or chronic patients. The tetraplegic patients estimated their HRQL signi®cantly lower than patients with incomplete paraplegia.Of the three subgroups studied, those with pediatric SCI were well adjusted on the basis of anamnestic information and scored high on HRQL when compared with the other two subgroups. Patients injured in adulthood rated their overall HRQL lower and were often unable to return to work. Patients injured in childhood expressed better performance in physical functions than patients who had sustained their injury in adulthood. The subgroups did not di er in psychological functions.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of health-related quality of life in three subgroups of spinal cord injury patients

et al. 1998

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In fact, a great deal of research has suggested that the members of stigmatized groups are particularly attuned to how others perceive and evaluate them. In any given interaction they aim to be treated as if they do not have the stigma (Hebl, Tickle, & Heatherton, 2000), and they monitor the extent to which they are successful at affiliating with and being accepted by nonstigmatized others (Wright, 1983). From this perspective, most members of most stigmatized groups should strive to convince themselves that they rarely experience the kind of routine discrimination that so frequently befalls their fellow in-group members.…”

Section: Why Does It Occur?mentioning

confidence: 99%

When fiends become friends: The need to belong and perceptions of personal and group discrimination.

Carvallo¹,

Pelham²

2006

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present article examines the role that the need to belong (NTB) plays in people's judgments of personal and group discrimination and in the attributions people make for potentially discriminatory evaluations. The authors hypothesized that the NTB motivates people to conclude that (a) whereas they rarely experience personal discrimination, (b) their fellow in-group members do experience discrimination. In Study 1, people high in the NTB reported experiencing lower than average levels of personal and higher than average levels of group discrimination. In Study 2, an experimental manipulation of the NTB yielded similar results. In Study 3, women who were motivated to be accepted by a bogus male participant were less likely to attribute his negative evaluations of their work to prejudice.

show abstract

“…Support for this stance comes from empirical evidence reported in recent meta-analytic reviews (summarised by Norcross & Wampold, 2011) that highlighted the importance of three factors, these being: client-perceived empathy that predicts therapeutic outcome better than observer-or counsellor-rated empathy, especially among less experienced counsellors; a strong therapeutic alliance, that is to say a partnership of mutual collaboration between counsellor and client; and client feedback collected regularly by counsellors. From this perspective, clients may be inherently motivated to achieve their goals when they are afforded participation in a collaborative counsellor-client relationship; and when they are active co-managers in their vocational rehabilitation programs (Wright, 1983).…”

Section: Unique Aspects Of MI and Pcamentioning

confidence: 99%

Can Motivational Interviewing be Truly Integrated with Person-centered Counselling?

Crisp

2015

The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

T his article examines whether Motivational Interviewing (MI) can be truly integrated with Carl Rogers' person-centered approach (PCA) to counselling. While the 'spirit' of MI has much in common with PCA, it is argued that the theory and practice of MI indicates several fundamental differences with PCA that distinguishes the ways that each perspective may contribute to rehabilitation counselling. These differences are discussed in relation to the unique aspects of their underlying assumptions, how they define clients' problems, and how they articulate the role of counsellor and successful outcome. Recent metaanalyses have indicated the beneficial aspects of both approaches. Empirical evidence for the efficacy of both MI and PCA is strong across a diverse range of client groups and health care settings. However, the highly variable effectiveness of both MI and PCA suggests that further process-outcome research is needed. Implications for rehabilitation counsellors are discussed. Keywords: Motivational interviewing, person-centered counsellingMotivational Interviewing (MI) has been defined by Miller and Rollnick (2002, 2009, 2012 as an evolution of Carl Rogers' Person-Centered Approach (PCA) to counselling. However, they argue that MI departs from PCA by being consciously goaloriented, by being intentionally directive and by selectively reinforcing the client's change talk. Despite these differences, commentators have often alluded to the debt that MI owes PCA (e.g., Britt, Blampied & Hudson, 2003;Csillik, 2013;Mason, 2009;Wagner & McMahon, 2004). Recent commentaries have also aligned the traditional rehabilitation counselling theme of self-determination with both MI (Page & Tchernitskaia, 2014;Wagner & McMahon, 2004) and PCA (Crisp, 2011).It is easy to conflate the "spirit" of MI (Miller & Rollnick, 2002, pp.34-5) with PCA since both approaches value collaboration, both aim to elicit the client's own intrinsic motivation for change, and they privilege the client's autonomy. They share a disdain for confrontation, a preference for drawing on the client's own resources rather than imparting knowledge, and avoid taking an authoritarian stance. But, can Address for correspondence: PO Box 1172, Croydon, VIC. 3136, Australia, E-mail: ross.crispsy@gmail.com While Miller and Rollnick (2002, 2009, 2012 acknowledge Rogers' (1961) emphasis on reflective listening, MI and PCA tend to diverge in several ways, not least in their notions of empathic understanding and reflective listening. In this article, I will contend that PCA is not easily integrated with MI because MI diverges significantly from PCA in both its non-directive and directive aspects. In Table 1, MI is summarised and compared with PCA in terms of theory, practice and evidence-based research. The issues listed in Table 1 serve as the framework for the discussion that follows. The aim of this article is to clarify the differences between MI and PCA and the implications for the practice of rehabilitation counselling.

show abstract

Physical disability - a psychosocial approach (2nd ed.).

Cited by 710 publications

References 0 publications

Comparison of health-related quality of life in three subgroups of spinal cord injury patients

Comparison of health-related quality of life in three subgroups of spinal cord injury patients

When fiends become friends: The need to belong and perceptions of personal and group discrimination.

Can Motivational Interviewing be Truly Integrated with Person-centered Counselling?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About