1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00128.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical distance and interpersonal characteristics in college students’romantic relationships

Abstract: This study compared college students’long‐distance romantic relationships (N= 80) with those that were not long‐distance (N= 82) on nine variables that have been suggested as fundamentally important in intimate relationships. Members of long‐distance relationships (LDKs) reported less descriptive self‐disclosure and companionship with their partners, and they were less certain their relationships would endure. The two types of relationships did not differ on the remaining six intimacy processes: intimate self‐… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sandow (2014) defined long-distance commuters as those who have to travel more than 30 km. In social-psychological studies, authors have often used the self-reported existence of a long-distance relationship (Billedo et al 2015;Pistole et al 2010;Guldner and Swensen 1995;Van Horn et al 1997).…”
Section: Explanatory Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sandow (2014) defined long-distance commuters as those who have to travel more than 30 km. In social-psychological studies, authors have often used the self-reported existence of a long-distance relationship (Billedo et al 2015;Pistole et al 2010;Guldner and Swensen 1995;Van Horn et al 1997).…”
Section: Explanatory Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to explicit relationship quality, two additional constructs were of interest to the present study: communication quality and relationship investment. Both of these may be considered somewhat distinct from relationship quality in the context of romantic relationships, in which high‐quality communication and deep commitment are not necessarily present even when couples are reportedly happy (Baxter & Bullis, ; Van Horn et al, ). All hypothesized effects for relationship quality noted above were expected for communication quality and relationship investment as well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the research result of Horn, Arnone, Nesbitt, Desllets, Sears, Giffin, & Brudi [4] about college student long-distance relationships (N=80) which is compared with those that were not long-distance (N=82) on nine variables that have been suggested as fundamentally important in intimate relationships. The long-distance relationships (LDRs) members is stated that they have less descriptive self-disclosure and companionship with their partners, affection, enhancement of worth, instrumental help, nurturance, and partner's perspective-taking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%