2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical examination and in vivo kinematics in two posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a large randomized controlled study designed with sufficient statistical power to assess TKA performance in bilateral TKA patients, Kim et al [ 23 ] were unable to detect differences between cruciate-retaining TKA and posterior-stabilized TKA using clinical outcome scores and goniometric measurements of the range of motion. Other studies have used combined clinical outcome scores and fluoroscopic assessment of knee flexion kinematics to detect inferior functional performance of TKA designs [ 14 , 39 , 40 , 46 ]. In a randomized controlled study of PCL-retaining mobile-bearing TKA assessed using fluoroscopy, Lützner et al [ 46 ] reported lack of functional improvement in some patients supported by significantly lower KSS function scores and axial rotation biased toward femoral internal rotation during nonweight bearing passive knee flexion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a large randomized controlled study designed with sufficient statistical power to assess TKA performance in bilateral TKA patients, Kim et al [ 23 ] were unable to detect differences between cruciate-retaining TKA and posterior-stabilized TKA using clinical outcome scores and goniometric measurements of the range of motion. Other studies have used combined clinical outcome scores and fluoroscopic assessment of knee flexion kinematics to detect inferior functional performance of TKA designs [ 14 , 39 , 40 , 46 ]. In a randomized controlled study of PCL-retaining mobile-bearing TKA assessed using fluoroscopy, Lützner et al [ 46 ] reported lack of functional improvement in some patients supported by significantly lower KSS function scores and axial rotation biased toward femoral internal rotation during nonweight bearing passive knee flexion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rehabilitation following onset of knee joint disease, injury or surgery often requires assessment of mobility during common activity of daily living, such as walking or rising from a chair [1,2], or deep knee bends [3,4]. In these studies, highly sophisticated optical or radiographic systems were used to assess knee joint motion; however, this technology is not available to the majority of clinics, and costs of personnel, training and maintenance can be prohibitive even when such facilities are readily available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sharp edge may come in contact with the PCL, leading to damage and subsequent PCL laxity. In a previous study comparing the CKS and the PFC prostheses, kinematic analysis supported the suspicion that the CKS design has larger AP translations than the PFC design (Ploegmakers et al 2010). Although clinical ratings such as the KSS, total WOMAC, and VAS did not show any statistically significant difference in that study, subscores regarding higher flexion and higher-demanding activities showed greater limitations in knees with a CKS design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%