2020
DOI: 10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.8736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Fitness and Indicators of Cardiovascular Risk in Population with Intellectual Disability

Abstract: Introducción: el objetivo de esta investigación fue determinar la relación entre condición física e indicadores indirectos de riesgo cardiovascular de niños y jóvenes con discapacidad intelectual. Materiales y métodos: estudio observacional de corte transversal, que evaluó la condición física de 175 estudiantes con discapacidad intelectual, utilizando la batería Brockport Physical Fitness para menores de 18 años; para mayores de 18, se utilizaron las mismas pruebas, pero con baremos para su edad. Para el análi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no differences between sexes in the three functional tests performed; however, in the present study, men presented the best performance for all variables. Most of the literature reports that there are significant differences between sexes in functional capacity, particularly in tests associated with physical capacity, strength, balance, and cardiorespiratory capacity [70,71], indicating that men show more favorable values [72].…”
Section: Functional Capacity Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were no differences between sexes in the three functional tests performed; however, in the present study, men presented the best performance for all variables. Most of the literature reports that there are significant differences between sexes in functional capacity, particularly in tests associated with physical capacity, strength, balance, and cardiorespiratory capacity [70,71], indicating that men show more favorable values [72].…”
Section: Functional Capacity Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%