1987
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330730407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical growth of infants 7 to 13 months of age: Results from a national survey

Abstract: This study considers measurements of weight, recumbent length, head circumference, triceps skinfold, and arm circumference of 1,100 infants aged 7 to 13 months from a cross-sectional sample representative of the U.S. infant population. Based on these data, smoothed percentiles of weight, recumbent length, head circumference, triceps skinfold, and arm circumference by sex and age (in months) and weight for recumbent length were calculated. Compared with the percentile values from the National Center for Health … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fat stores were assessed by measurements of TSF and MFA, and the somatic protein stores by MMC and MMA. Fat and protein stores were classified as normal, nutritionally at risk, or deficient as defined by Frisancho [7], Ryan and Martinez [8]. Normal values for weight for length and length for age were derived from the Standards of the National Center of Health Statistics [9].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fat stores were assessed by measurements of TSF and MFA, and the somatic protein stores by MMC and MMA. Fat and protein stores were classified as normal, nutritionally at risk, or deficient as defined by Frisancho [7], Ryan and Martinez [8]. Normal values for weight for length and length for age were derived from the Standards of the National Center of Health Statistics [9].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Somatic protein stores were assessed by mid-arm muscle diameter and MMA. Fat and protein stores were classified as normal, nutritionally at risk, or deficient as defined by Frisancho [16], Ryan and Martinez [17]. Standards of the National Center of Health Statistics were used for the assessment of weight for length and length for age [18].…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fat stores are assessed by measurements of TSF and MFA; somatic protein stores are assessed by MMC and MMA. Both, fat and protein stores are classified as normal, nutritionally at risk, or deficient, according to Frisancho [37,38] and Ryan, Martinez [39] or the Standards of the Ten-State Nutritional Survey [40] tables.…”
Section: Anthropometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%