Physical Impairments and Degenerate Minds

Pitts, Yvonne

doi:10.1017/cbo9781139564991.005

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another related measure, an amendment to the treason statute also passed in 2012, treats dissemination of state secrets to foreign or multinational organizations (not just foreign governments) as a serious criminal offense. 260 Such a measure directly impinges on the work of organizations that monitor abusive state action and state corruption. Tellingly, the first entity to be charged with failing to register was Golos, a major election monitoring organization that revealed widespread voter fraud in 2011.…”

Section: Nadia Urbinati Democracy Disfigured: Opinion Truth and Thementioning

confidence: 99%

How to Lose a Constitutional Democracy

Huq

Ginsburg

2017

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Is the United States at risk of democratic backsliding? And would the Constitution prevent such decay? To many, the 2016 election campaign and the conduct of newly installed President Donald Trump may be the immediate catalyst for these questions. But structural changes to the socioeconomic environment and geopolitical shifts are what make the question a truly pressing one. Eschewing a focus on current events, this Article develops a taxonomy of different threats of democratic backsliding, the mechanisms whereby they unfold, and the comparative risk of each threat in the contemporary moment. By drawing on comparative law and politics experience, we demonstrate that there are two modal paths of democratic decay. We call these authoritarian reversion and constitutional retrogression. A reversion is a rapid and near-complete collapse of democratic institutions. Retrogression is a more subtle, incremental erosion to three institutional predicates of democracy occurring simultaneously: competitive elections; rights of political speech and association; and the administrative and adjudicative rule of law. We show that over the past quarter-century, the risk of reversion in democracies around the world has declined, whereas the risk of retrogression has spiked. The United States is neither exceptional nor immune from these changes. We evaluate the danger of retrogression as clear and present here (and elsewhere), whereas we think reversion is much less likely. We further demonstrate that the constitutional safeguards against retrogression are weak. The nearterm prospects of constitutional liberal democracy hence depend less on our institutions than on the qualities of political leadership, popular resistance, and the quiddities of partisan coalitional politics.

show abstract

Section: Nadia Urbinati Democracy Disfigured: Opinion Truth and Thementioning

confidence: 99%