2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-1810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical insight into a Mach 7.2 compression corner flow

Abstract: High-order implicit Large Eddy Simulations were conducted to study shock-boundary layer interaction around a 33 compression corner at Mach 7.2 and Reynolds number of Re ✓ = 3,500 based on the momentum thickness. A grid-convergence study was performed to reduce the computational uncertainty and the results were compared with experiments and theoretical predictions. Furthermore, the turbulent flow properties were analysed with respect to the Reynolds normal stress, skewness and flatness, and conclusions were dra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present mesh spacing (∆y) is scaled using the conventional inner variable method ∆y + = u τ ∆y/ν w , where u τ = τ w /ρ w is the friction velocity, ν w is the near wall kinematic viscosity, τ w is the near wall shear stress, and ρ w is the near wall density. A mesh convergence study was performed in [21] with the two finer meshes, G2 and G3, showing close agreement in all calculated quantities and justifying the use of G3 in the further analysis.…”
Section: Hypersonic Flow Over a Compression/expansion Rampmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present mesh spacing (∆y) is scaled using the conventional inner variable method ∆y + = u τ ∆y/ν w , where u τ = τ w /ρ w is the friction velocity, ν w is the near wall kinematic viscosity, τ w is the near wall shear stress, and ρ w is the near wall density. A mesh convergence study was performed in [21] with the two finer meshes, G2 and G3, showing close agreement in all calculated quantities and justifying the use of G3 in the further analysis.…”
Section: Hypersonic Flow Over a Compression/expansion Rampmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…This will allow to showcase similarities and differences between the various hypersonic boundary layers in the context of acoustic loading. The flow results for the STBLI case have been previously compared with available Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS) and experimental data [21], while the results for the transitional boundary layer presented here are based on a previous more detailed study by the authors [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNS3D can be used for implicit Large Eddy Simulations (iLES) and Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS) 12,[28][29][30] . There is also a Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) version of the code.…”
Section: Iles Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%