2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2003.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical mechanisms of the rogue wave phenomenon

Abstract: Abstract:A review of physical mechanisms of the rogue wave phenomenon is given. The data of marine observations as well as laboratory experiments are briefly discussed. They demonstrate that freak waves may appear in deep and shallow waters. Simple statistical analysis of the rogue wave probability based on the assumption of a Gaussian wave field is reproduced. In the context of water wave theories the probabilistic approach shows that numerical simulations of freak waves should be made for very long times on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

16
764
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,013 publications
(809 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
16
764
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been some assumptions on the generation mechanism of freak wave, such as linear dispersive focusing, wave-current interaction, bottom topography influence-wind force on free surface, self-focusing due to boundary instability, and nonlinear wave-wave interaction, and so on (Kharif and Pelinovsky 2003). Linear dispersive focusing model, which shows a good predictability through pre-defining the size and shape of an abnormal wave, has been widely used as an efficient method to reproduce freak wave in both numerical and experimental studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been some assumptions on the generation mechanism of freak wave, such as linear dispersive focusing, wave-current interaction, bottom topography influence-wind force on free surface, self-focusing due to boundary instability, and nonlinear wave-wave interaction, and so on (Kharif and Pelinovsky 2003). Linear dispersive focusing model, which shows a good predictability through pre-defining the size and shape of an abnormal wave, has been widely used as an efficient method to reproduce freak wave in both numerical and experimental studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conformity with this definition, RWs were detected in a photonic crystal fibre [12], in a multi-stable state of an erbium-doped fibre laser [15], in chaotic but deterministic regime of optical injected semiconductor lasers [5,8], in nonlinear optical cavity [11], in acoustic turbulence in He II [9] and other set-ups [13]. On the formation of the ocean RWs, a number of supporting theories have been developed [1][2][3][4]. Among various possible factors contributing to the creation of the RW, the modulation instability (MI) supported by the nonlinear effect is believed to play a crucial role, by inducing preliminary amplification of water wave height, which may trigger self-attractive nonlinear interaction, initiating the RW formation [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher rational solutions having free parameters [26,27] become parameterless for a single-peak RW solution [27]. On the other hand, in our two-dimensional RW model the maximum amplitude A rog (c) can be varied continuously and increased as required, by tuning an arbitrary parameter c in the same single-peak, first-order solution (3.1) or its dynamical extension (3.8) (as shown in figure 4a-d), making the model suitable for RWs with a diverse range of heights, anywhere in the range 17-30 m in calm sea [1][2][3][4][5][6], as observed in deep-sea two-dimensional RWs.…”
Section: (A) Static Lump Solitonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[3] The scientific community has studied the topic experimentally (in water tanks) [Onorato et al, 2004[Onorato et al, , 2006, observationally (with satellite imaging, for example) [Dankert et al, 2003;Schulz-Stellenfleth and Lehner, 2004], and theoretically [Kharif and Pelinovsky, 2003]. A review of recent progress in freak wave forecasting can be found in an article by Dysthe et al [2008].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%