1950
DOI: 10.1097/00010694-195008000-00025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Methods of Organic Chemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

1951
1951
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The techniques, theory, and data analysis involved in determination of binary diffusion coefficients from this instrument have been described in the literature (Gosting et al, 1949;Weissberger, 1972;Cussler, 1976;Tyrrell and Harris, 1984). Several improvements over traditional instruments were incorporated in the construction of tile Gouy diffusiometer used in this work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The techniques, theory, and data analysis involved in determination of binary diffusion coefficients from this instrument have been described in the literature (Gosting et al, 1949;Weissberger, 1972;Cussler, 1976;Tyrrell and Harris, 1984). Several improvements over traditional instruments were incorporated in the construction of tile Gouy diffusiometer used in this work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 as a immersion data in Table I and a knowledge of hL using equation [I]. T h e dipole moments are those of Smyth (7). If it is assumed that the differences in the total adsorption energy arise primarily from E,, then, according to equation [7], the slope of the line in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T h e dipole moments are those of Smyth (7). If it is assumed that the differences in the total adsorption energy arise primarily from E,, then, according to equation [7], the slope of the line in Fig. 1 is a measure of the average electrostatic field strength of the rutile surface immersed in the liquids.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The molecular refraction increments for the CH 2 groups, obtained by comparing closest homologues, rise from 4.65 to 4.72. For n-paraffins the increments for the CH 2 group differ from, an average value of 4.64 (for the D line of sodium) by only a few hundredths of a cm 3 except for the first few members of the series (51,52). The increasing atomic and bond refractivities resulting from the increasing alkylation must be due either to an increasing atomic refractivity or to some other factor which increases the molecular refraction.…”
Section: Molecular Atomic and Bond Refractionmentioning
confidence: 87%