2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Modeling of the Proton Density in Nanopores of PEM Fuel Cell Catalyst Layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some hypothesize that there is a strong specific interaction between PFSA sulfonate groups and platinum and that this interaction drives PFSA adsorption to catalyst particles in inks. However, we do not see indications of this (due to low adsorption), counter to other experimental evidence that shows sulfonate adsorption to platinum surfaces. , This is rationalized because the platinum in those experiments was polarized (relative to the potential of zero charge ), while ours is under no applied potential. Additionally, in the operando PFSA/platinum interaction studies, the platinum is likely in a metallic state; conversely, the platinum surfaces here (and found in inks) will have some native oxide coverage, which has been shown to impact PFSA behavior .…”
contrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Some hypothesize that there is a strong specific interaction between PFSA sulfonate groups and platinum and that this interaction drives PFSA adsorption to catalyst particles in inks. However, we do not see indications of this (due to low adsorption), counter to other experimental evidence that shows sulfonate adsorption to platinum surfaces. , This is rationalized because the platinum in those experiments was polarized (relative to the potential of zero charge ), while ours is under no applied potential. Additionally, in the operando PFSA/platinum interaction studies, the platinum is likely in a metallic state; conversely, the platinum surfaces here (and found in inks) will have some native oxide coverage, which has been shown to impact PFSA behavior .…”
contrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Recently, Eikerling et al reported a significantly enhanced proton concentration for pore geometries for which the total Debye length is greater than the pore width that further enhances conductivity. 76 In addition, the thickness and structure of the ionomer influences the oxygen permeation to the catalyst particles. 77 A reduction in Pt loading of the electrodes could decrease the fraction of hydrophilic surface area 78 and may influence the resulting ionomer structure and the electrode conductivity.…”
Section: Influence Of Fuel Cell Operation-thinning Of Ionomer Films-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it predicts the impact of pH on the metal charging behaviour [73]. It was applied to rationalize electrochemical processes in a water-filled nanopore with Pt plated walls [75], the particle proximity effect in nanoparticle electrocatalysis [76], and induced charge effects by an ionomer skin layer in catalyst layers of PEM fuel cells [77]. In combination with microkinetic modeling and input of basic boundary layer and reaction parameters from electronic DFT, the model allowed the oxygen reduction reaction to be deciphered and effective electrode parameters to be calculated [78], as explained in Figure 4 The CHE has been the most versatile and successful computational approach to date.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscript 3 Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%