1979
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-81294-1_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Modeling of Underwater Acoustics

Abstract: With 17 FiguresIn the attempt to explain underwater acoustic phenomena and to exploit these phenomena in useful ways a number of techniques for analysis have been developed. These include, but are not limited to, mathematical analysis, numerical modeling, in situ empirical description, and physical modeling. All have made substantial contributions to our understanding of the WQy in which sound behaves in water. The purpose of this chapter is to review the methods and results of physical modeling and to discuss… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourth, our multiple scatter result (curve d) works well for large roughness whereas the single scatter theories fail for one reason or another. We should also note that there is a great deal of scatter within these and other [Zornig, 1979] data, and the data results we chose roughly bracket this data scatter. For the specific case where the surface was constructed to agree with our theoretical assumption of a Gaussian distribution [Numrich, 1979]…”
Section: Deterministic Rough Interfacementioning
confidence: 87%
“…Fourth, our multiple scatter result (curve d) works well for large roughness whereas the single scatter theories fail for one reason or another. We should also note that there is a great deal of scatter within these and other [Zornig, 1979] data, and the data results we chose roughly bracket this data scatter. For the specific case where the surface was constructed to agree with our theoretical assumption of a Gaussian distribution [Numrich, 1979]…”
Section: Deterministic Rough Interfacementioning
confidence: 87%