Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground 2021
DOI: 10.1201/9780429321559-63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical modelling of transient processes at the slurry supported tunnel face during shield excavation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the slurry-infiltrated layer that is formed in front of the tunnel face is extremely thin, only approximately 20 mm. This is dangerous for the tunnel face because a filter cake with such a thin slurry-infiltrated layer is vulnerable to damage when considering the cutting depth of the cutting tools (Zizka, 2019). For infiltration of water-bentonite slurry into medium and coarse sands, the hydraulic conductivity of sand for slurry is also significantly reduced, but the infiltration distance is much greater, reaching about 300 mm in 1 h.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the slurry-infiltrated layer that is formed in front of the tunnel face is extremely thin, only approximately 20 mm. This is dangerous for the tunnel face because a filter cake with such a thin slurry-infiltrated layer is vulnerable to damage when considering the cutting depth of the cutting tools (Zizka, 2019). For infiltration of water-bentonite slurry into medium and coarse sands, the hydraulic conductivity of sand for slurry is also significantly reduced, but the infiltration distance is much greater, reaching about 300 mm in 1 h.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lining element is configured to be impermeable, thus limiting seepage to the tunnel face alone. With reference to the experimental investigations conducted in Zizka [41], other parameters are set as follows: γ slu = 12 kN/m 3 and k, the permeability coefficient, is 5 × 10 −8 m/s. The groundwater level H w and excess slurry pressure p differ from the working conditions.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Seepage Flow Due To Excess Slurry Pr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lining element is configured to be impermeable, thus limiting seepage to the tunnel face alone. With reference to the experimental investigations conducted in Zizka [41], other parameters are set as follows: The numerical pore pressure distribution of a typical case is presented in Figure 5, where H w /d = 1.0, p = 50 kPa. As a result of the influence of excess slurry pressure, the hydraulic conditions have undergone a significant alteration, and the pore pressures ahead of the tunnel are noticeably greater than the hydrostatic pressures, particularly in the vicinity of the tunnel face.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Seepage Flow Due To Excess Slurry Pr...mentioning
confidence: 99%