2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical performance limitations of luminescent down-conversion layers for photovoltaic applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[5][6][7] In this regard, the ongoing claims of observing an efficient quantum cutting especially in the case of Ce 3þ /Eu 2þ -Yb 3þ codoped materials raises serious concerns and confusion. [8][9][10][11] Recent studies on Ce 3þ (donor)-Yb 3þ (acceptor) and other similar redox ions codoped materials have demonstrated that the donor de-excitation and donor to acceptor energy sensitization involves an electron transfer process and not the cooperative energy transfer process as was considered earlier. [12][13][14][15] Electron transfer and energy transfer interactions are well established processes responsible for several physical phenomena such as the energy storage, scintillation, afterglow, quenching, and sensitization.…”
Section: In Borate Glassmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…[5][6][7] In this regard, the ongoing claims of observing an efficient quantum cutting especially in the case of Ce 3þ /Eu 2þ -Yb 3þ codoped materials raises serious concerns and confusion. [8][9][10][11] Recent studies on Ce 3þ (donor)-Yb 3þ (acceptor) and other similar redox ions codoped materials have demonstrated that the donor de-excitation and donor to acceptor energy sensitization involves an electron transfer process and not the cooperative energy transfer process as was considered earlier. [12][13][14][15] Electron transfer and energy transfer interactions are well established processes responsible for several physical phenomena such as the energy storage, scintillation, afterglow, quenching, and sensitization.…”
Section: In Borate Glassmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…By definition, the maximum theoretical achievable iPLQY for an UC process is 50%, which is difficult to achieve experimentally. The short-fall between the theoretical limit and the measured values is caused by several factors including nonradiative losses like multiphonon relaxation, concentration quenching, and self-absorption [9][10][11]. Additionally, the ePLQY is also constrained by the absorbance of the UC material, whose optical performances may be considerably lowered if a weak absorption cross section at the pump wavelength is present.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a self-absorption loss mechanism has been reported in erbium (Er 3 )-doped barium yttrium fluoride (BaY 2 F 8 ) where it has been minimized by experimentally optimizing the thickness of the sample [13]. Moreover, an optical model describing how the self-absorption affects PLQY measurements in a DC luminescent material has been demonstrated in [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third issue is self-absorption (also termed inner-filter effect) which has been shown to influence iPLQY values at high concentrations (typically above an absorbance of 0.1) of the active luminescent species. 21,22 Self-absorption is also more prominent for materials such as fluorescent organic dyes that exhibit lower Stokes shifts and hence exhibit a greater overlap in the absorption and emission spectrum. This process occurs when an emitted photon is re-absorbed by the sample (one or multiple times) via radiative energy transfer and can therefore reduce the iPLQY in the case of a non-unity value.…”
Section: B Determination Of Iplqymentioning
confidence: 99%