2016
DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2016.1257461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical planning implication of Eyo festival in Lagos Island, Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Factor 1 accounted for 12.75 per cent variance; Factor 2 accounted for 11.76 per cent variance, whilst Factors 3 and 4 accounted for 10.58 and 7.84 per cent variance, respectively; Factor 5 accounted for 4.48 per cent variance; Factors 6 and 7 accounted for 4.15 and 3.68 per cent variance, respectively; and Factors 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 accounted for 3.66, 2.96, 2.96, 2.76, 2.76, 2.59 and 2.58 per cent variance, respectively. This study agrees with Agbabiaka (2016) who adopted 0.55 and above; therefore, any variable loading with value that is greater than 0.55 will be interpreted in line with Agbabiaka (2016). It should be noted that any component that has less than two variables loaded highly on it should be disregarded (Field, 2005).…”
Section: Findings and Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Factor 1 accounted for 12.75 per cent variance; Factor 2 accounted for 11.76 per cent variance, whilst Factors 3 and 4 accounted for 10.58 and 7.84 per cent variance, respectively; Factor 5 accounted for 4.48 per cent variance; Factors 6 and 7 accounted for 4.15 and 3.68 per cent variance, respectively; and Factors 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 accounted for 3.66, 2.96, 2.96, 2.76, 2.76, 2.59 and 2.58 per cent variance, respectively. This study agrees with Agbabiaka (2016) who adopted 0.55 and above; therefore, any variable loading with value that is greater than 0.55 will be interpreted in line with Agbabiaka (2016). It should be noted that any component that has less than two variables loaded highly on it should be disregarded (Field, 2005).…”
Section: Findings and Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It is important to note that only variables with value above 0.55 were interpreted in this matrix. It is equally important to know that only components that have at least two variables which were highly loaded than 0.55 were named and discussed in line with Agbabiaka (2016).…”
Section: Findings and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tabachnick and Fidell (1996) suggested that variables with loadings 0.32 and above may be interpreted. In other studies where factor analysis has been applied, such as Olayiwola (1990), Adeyinka (2007), and Agbabiaka (2016), 0.32 and 0.55 were used as cutoff points. This study, therefore, used 0.5, which is considered to be good as it has 30% overlapping variance (Tabachnick & Fidell 1996).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having 30 variables or more gives communalities greater than 0.7 for all variables; however, less than 20 variables can have communalities less than 0.4 (Guadagnoli & Velicer, 1988). Communalities after extraction are expected to be high to have a reasonable representation (Agbabiaka, 2016). From the result in Table 4, communalities are higher than 0.70 for all variables.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 96%