2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical-priors-guided DehazeFormer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This category of algorithms is predicated on the principles of atmospheric scattering theory, resolving the atmospheric scattering (Eq. ( 1)) by imbuing it with supplementary conditions to render it nonpathological [24,25]. These algorithms leverage diverse a priori information as auxiliary inputs to estimate the parameters λ, η, and β in Eq.…”
Section: Physical Model-based Defogging Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This category of algorithms is predicated on the principles of atmospheric scattering theory, resolving the atmospheric scattering (Eq. ( 1)) by imbuing it with supplementary conditions to render it nonpathological [24,25]. These algorithms leverage diverse a priori information as auxiliary inputs to estimate the parameters λ, η, and β in Eq.…”
Section: Physical Model-based Defogging Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [11] improved ASM and proposed AODNet. In recent years, the relatively novel dehazing work has included end-to-end methods [12][13][14][15], attention mechanism methods [16,17], weakly supervised methods [18], semisupervised methods [19][20][21], knowledge-distillation-based methods [22,23], contrastivelearning-based methods [24,25], and Transformer-based methods [26][27][28][29]. Although these methods have been very successful, these dehazing network models are often accompanied by complex network structures and large model parameters, which have high computational overhead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%