2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2009.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical properties and structure of aquatic silk fiber from Stenopsyche marmorata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, drought conditions have been shown to drive shifts in species interactions, availability of food resources, and adaptations for surviving low flow conditions (Peterson, 1987;Lake, 2003). The glands that produce caddisfly silk can show differences in tensile strength and elongation potential in wet and dry states (Tsukada et al, 2010), but we detected minimal differences in silk thread characteristics under wet versus dry conditions in this study. Free-living caddisfly populations are particularly sensitive to drought conditions and typically recruit poorly the year after drought (Boulton, 2003).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…In addition, drought conditions have been shown to drive shifts in species interactions, availability of food resources, and adaptations for surviving low flow conditions (Peterson, 1987;Lake, 2003). The glands that produce caddisfly silk can show differences in tensile strength and elongation potential in wet and dry states (Tsukada et al, 2010), but we detected minimal differences in silk thread characteristics under wet versus dry conditions in this study. Free-living caddisfly populations are particularly sensitive to drought conditions and typically recruit poorly the year after drought (Boulton, 2003).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…The presence of water can greatly reduce T g as water is a known plasticizer and promotes molecular mobility (Sperling, 2005). Not surprisingly, many invertebrate silks, such as silkworm cocoon silk (P erez-Rigueiro et al, 2000;Plaza et al, 2008), lacewing silk egg stalks (Bauer et al, 2012), caddisfly net silk (Tsukada et al, 2010) and various spider silks (Gosline, Denny & DeMont, 1984;Shao, Young & Vollrath, 1999) as well as mussel byssus (Smeathers & Vincent, 1979;Troncoso, Torres & Grande, 2008), become rubberized when exposed to water, as stiffness (Young's modulus) is reduced and extensibility (breaking strain) is increased. This softening effect is believed to be the result of water molecules disrupting intermolecular hydrogen bonds (Termonia, 1994;Bauer et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…honeybees, crickets, ants, hornets, lacewings, silverfish, caddis flies and chironomid midges (Weisman et al, 2008;Sehnal and Sutherland, 2008;Sutherland et al 2010;Walker et al, 2012;Sutherland et al, 2011). In the purview of aquatic silks spun underwater, the retreat maker caddisworms (Stewart and Wang 2010;Tsukada et al, 2010;Ohkawa et al, 2014;Ashton et al, 2016) and larval chironomid midges (Grossbach, 1977;Hertner et al, 1980;Wellman and Case, 1989;Case et al, 1994) have exhibited how habitats influence the nature, composition and properties of silk. This review focusses on the underexplored silk-spinning expertise and the little known physiological biochemistry of silk protein produced by Chironomus larvae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%