Magnetic Structures of 2D and 3D Nanoparticles 2018
DOI: 10.1201/b19845-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Properties of 2D Spin-Crossover Solids from an Electro-Elastic Description: Effect of Shape, Size, and Spin-Distortion Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of our simple assumption, the thermal hysteresis moves according to the atomic surface/volume ratio, in very good agreement with the available experimental data of Volatron et al [64]. Since this pioneering work, the electroelastic model has been extended to incorporate the case of core-shell SCO nanoparticles, made of an active SCO core and an inert shell, where we investigated the detailed properties of the SCO core as a function of the elastic properties (rigidity, lattice parameter misfit, and size) of the shell [65][66][67][68][69][70]. It is worth mentioning that other groups investigated the problem of active core-shell SCO nanoparticles by considering hollow core-shell configurations, or by studying their vibrational properties as well the role of the elastic interface energy in the stability of the nanoparticles [71][72][73].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…As a result of our simple assumption, the thermal hysteresis moves according to the atomic surface/volume ratio, in very good agreement with the available experimental data of Volatron et al [64]. Since this pioneering work, the electroelastic model has been extended to incorporate the case of core-shell SCO nanoparticles, made of an active SCO core and an inert shell, where we investigated the detailed properties of the SCO core as a function of the elastic properties (rigidity, lattice parameter misfit, and size) of the shell [65][66][67][68][69][70]. It is worth mentioning that other groups investigated the problem of active core-shell SCO nanoparticles by considering hollow core-shell configurations, or by studying their vibrational properties as well the role of the elastic interface energy in the stability of the nanoparticles [71][72][73].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This two-dimensional system was originally designed to mimic a core-shell structure formed by an inner spin-active core with spin crossover properties and an outer spin-inactive shell. The electroelastic model has shown its merits in the analysis of the thermal spin transition of spin crossover nanoparticles [46][47][48]. The additional insight gained through this study will be a useful step toward the elucidation of the structural relationship between the core and the shell properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The surrounding environment of the spin crossover materials, like the shell in a core/shell structure [29][30][31][32][33][34] offers the possibility to design and control the spin transition in a way that can go beyond naturally occurring in a free spin crossover nanosystem. Different approaches have been proposed to realize speculative ideas about the impact of the surrounding environment on the yielding of the spin crossover materials [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48], but a detailed understanding of such relationship between the spin crossover core and the surrounding environment as well as their interplay with structural changes is challenging to unravel. The core-shell nanoparticles display a variety of complex phenomena as a marginal change in the transition temperature, a partial character of the spin transition as well as a significant lattice contraction through the spin transition which induces strain on the shell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34,35 Indeed, this configuration corresponds to the shortest interface length, which is the one which minimizes the elastic energy resulting from the lattice parameter misfit between the two phases. Moreover, prior theoretical investigations on the spatiotemporal aspects of the spin transition, based on Monte-Carlo simulations, showed that the geometry of the single crystal controls the interface dynamics on the one hand, and the elastic energy is strongly correlated with the length of the interface, 24,25,36,37 on the other. This reasoning has however severe limitations, when the change in the unit cell between the LS and HS is anisotropic, as we have reported in the single crystal [{Fe(NCSe)(py) 2 } 2 (μ-bpypz)].…”
Section: The Velocity Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presented experimental spatiotemporal results derived from OM studies on the SCO single crystal, [Fe(2pytrz) 2 {Pd(CN) 4 }]•3H 2 O, are interpreted here using a reaction diffusion model, developed in the group 36,38 which takes into account the local change in the HS fraction, and its spatial variation along the spin transition process. In contrast with the previous homogeneous mean-field approach where the HS fraction (or the magnetization) only depended on temperature, here we extend this study to include time and space in the order parameter.…”
Section: Theoretical Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%