2011
DOI: 10.2172/1022786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Properties of Niobium and Specifications for Fabrication of Superconducting Cavities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The usual method of tuning SRF cavities is simply via elastic deformation of the cavity walls, through an external forcing (such as a piezoelectric transducer, and/or a mechanical screw) [16,31]. To stay within the (low-temperature) elastic limit of niobium, the material strain should be < ∼ few×10 −3 [32]. For typical ∼ GHz cavities, this usually translates to a tunable range of a few hundred kHZ [16] -for higher cavity modes, the absolute range may be greater.…”
Section: A Srf Cavitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usual method of tuning SRF cavities is simply via elastic deformation of the cavity walls, through an external forcing (such as a piezoelectric transducer, and/or a mechanical screw) [16,31]. To stay within the (low-temperature) elastic limit of niobium, the material strain should be < ∼ few×10 −3 [32]. For typical ∼ GHz cavities, this usually translates to a tunable range of a few hundred kHZ [16] -for higher cavity modes, the absolute range may be greater.…”
Section: A Srf Cavitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usual method of tuning SRF cavities is simply via elastic deformation of the cavity walls, through an external forcing (such as a piezoelectric transducer, and/or a mechanical screw) [19,34]. To stay within the (lowtemperature) elastic limit of niobium, the material strain should be ≲few × 10 −3 [35]. For typical ∼GHz cavities, this usually translates to a tunable range of a few hundred kHZ [19]-for higher cavity modes, the absolute range may be greater.…”
Section: A Srf Cavitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. Considering the operational condition at 4.2 K, there will be about a 15% rise on Young's modulus of niobium and a 7% rise for stainless steel [21,22], with a corresponding 7.5% improvement on the modal frequency expected.…”
Section: A Modal Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 compare well with the predictions by Eqs. (16) and (22). The response is mainly determined by the condition in Eq.…”
Section: Transient Simulation In Two Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%