2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2012.04.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical properties of pharmaceutical pellets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…b  =  l are round pellets, b ˂ l are elliptical pellets having an aspect ratio 1.2–1.5. The limiting value is 1.1 for aspect ratio, whereas, the acceptable lower limit value for e R is 0.6 [27, 28]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b  =  l are round pellets, b ˂ l are elliptical pellets having an aspect ratio 1.2–1.5. The limiting value is 1.1 for aspect ratio, whereas, the acceptable lower limit value for e R is 0.6 [27, 28]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the literature presents the coefficient of restitution of spherical and cylindrical particles through experimental tests using various materials, including metal [12], microcrystalline cellulose [13], glass [14] and rubber [15]. Šibanc also determined Young's modulus, the tensile strength and the stiffness of pellets [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For granules and pellets, tensile strength (Equation 4) and Young's elastic modulus, related to the stiffness and crushing strength (hardness) of the material, are the most frequently determined. For this purpose, a strain chart can be obtained by using a texture analyzer device, in which the material is exposed to a given load against time (Santos et al, 2006;Šibanc et al, 2013;Yeung, Rein, 2015). Equation 4δ = tensile strength; F = intensity of the force required to break; r 2 = radius of the particle obtained by Feret´s diameter For friability, different adjustments are performed (Table IX), typically using glass or steel balls, in order to increase the material´s abrasion and improve the sensitivity of the method (Chopra, Venkatesan, Betageri, 2013;Issa et al, 2012b;Santos et al, 2006).…”
Section: Mechanical Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of Issa et al (2012b) reported an alternative in which the mass loss is measured by comparing the amounts retained in the sieves, where the particle size distribution is carried out before and after the assay. Bialleck, Rein, 2011;Podczeck, Newton, 2014;Santos et al, 2005 Pellets Hardness, tensile strength and relaxation module Cespi et al, 2007Pellets Hardness Costa, Pais, Sousa, 2004Ghanam, Hassan, Kleinebudde, 2010;Hamedelniel, Bajdik, Pintye-Hódi, 2010;Rabišková et al, 2012;Rahmaniam, Naji, Ghadiri, 2011 Pellets Tensile strength and elastic modulus Šibanc et al, 2013Minitablets Hardness Aleksovski et al, 2015Lopes et al, 2006;Stoltenberg, Breitkreutz, 2011;Tomuta, Leucuta, 2007;Weyenberg et al, 2006 Minitablets Tensile strength Tissen et al, 2011 *Hot melt extrusion…”
Section: Mechanical Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%