2006
DOI: 10.4314/nifoj.v24i1.33631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical, proximate, and cooking properties of selected Nigerian cowpea varieties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-significant associations between grain quality and nutritional quality traits suggest that desirable traits can be incorporated through trait introgression techniques. This is in agreement with several reported (Moura et al 2012;Muranaka et al 2015;Sanni et al 2006) results where cooking time was not associated with protein content in their study. However, cooking quality traits were shown to be significantly and positively correlated with grain quality traits.…”
Section: Hierarchical Clustering Of Genotypes Based On Grain Quality ...supporting
confidence: 94%
“…The non-significant associations between grain quality and nutritional quality traits suggest that desirable traits can be incorporated through trait introgression techniques. This is in agreement with several reported (Moura et al 2012;Muranaka et al 2015;Sanni et al 2006) results where cooking time was not associated with protein content in their study. However, cooking quality traits were shown to be significantly and positively correlated with grain quality traits.…”
Section: Hierarchical Clustering Of Genotypes Based On Grain Quality ...supporting
confidence: 94%
“…High dispersibility values obtained indicates that their is stability in reconstituted food product (Sanni et al . ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Amarteifio et al (2002) reported protein and fat contents of 19.0‐21.7 and 1.2‐1.3 per cent, respectively, for pigeon pea. Sanni et al (2006) reported 21.6‐23.4 and 1.1‐1.5 per cent protein and fat contents for different cowpea varieties. The values obtained for cowpea were within this range but the protein contents of Africa yam beans were higher than the value reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But there were no significant differences ( p ≥0.05) in the water‐absorption values of dehulled pigeon pea and African yam bean. Sanni et al (2006) reported swelling power ranging from 5.3 to 10.6 g/100 seeds for cowpea while Udensi and Okaka (2000) reported density and water‐absorption capacity of dried cowpea flour ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 g/cm 3 and 90‐185 per cent. Obatolu et al (2001) reported water‐absorption capacity of 131.9‐218.8 per cent for African yam beans flour.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%