1999
DOI: 10.5183/jjscs1988.12.67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Random Numbers Generated by Radioactivity

Abstract: We have developed a physical random number generator in which radioactivity, i.e., one of the most random phenomena, is used. The long-lived radioactive nuclide 241 Am and a clock pulse generator are used for generating random pulses and regular pulses, respectively. A 1024 channel scaler counts clock pulses between two consecutive random pulses. This procedure is repeated and the counts are stored in a computer.The last digit of a count at the scaler gives a digit of uniform physical random number.We have tes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conditional min-entropy of {d} is then (1) where H ∞ (d|x) ≡ − log 2 min d P (d|x) is the conditional minentropy of a single symbol generated with conditions x. Note that H ∞ ({d}|{x}) does not depend on the order of the elements of {x}, so that a knowledge of the relative frequencies F rel (x) with which the conditions x appear in {x} is sufficient to compute the mean min-entropy per symbol,…”
Section: Randomness Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conditional min-entropy of {d} is then (1) where H ∞ (d|x) ≡ − log 2 min d P (d|x) is the conditional minentropy of a single symbol generated with conditions x. Note that H ∞ ({d}|{x}) does not depend on the order of the elements of {x}, so that a knowledge of the relative frequencies F rel (x) with which the conditions x appear in {x} is sufficient to compute the mean min-entropy per symbol,…”
Section: Randomness Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processes used have included radioactive decay [1], path-splitting of single photons [2], photon number path entanglement [3], amplified spontaneous emission [4], measurement of the phase noise of a laser [5][6][7][8], photon arrival time [9], vacuum-seeded bistable processes [10], and stimulated Raman scattering [11]. Quantum random number generators (QRNGs) are attractive because their randomness can be linked to well-tested principles of quantum mechanics, e.g., the uncertainty principle [12], which guarantees a minimum amount of randomness in some physical quantities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, hardware based on quantum systems were proposed for the generation of random numbers e.g. path-splitting of photons [3], the phase noise of a laser [4,5], radio active decay [6], Raman scattering [7], and the arrival time of photons [8]. Yet, how can we trust that the generated random numbers are not subject to some underlying predictability originating from the construction of the hardware, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subset of physical RNGs, known as quantum RNGs (QRNGs) use a physical process with randomness derived from quantum processes. Processes used include radioactive decay [7], two-path splitting of single photons [8], photon number path entanglement [9], amplified spontaneous emission [10], measurement of the phase noise of a laser [11][12][13], photon arrival time [14], and vacuum-seeded bistable processes [15]. These physical RNGs and QRNGs show a trade-off between speed of generation and surety of the random bits generated: chaotic and ASE sources [5,6,16,17] reach hundreds of Gbps using signals that include contributions from both random and in-principle predictable sources, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%