2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020gc009085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Sources of High‐Frequency Seismic Noise on Cascadia Initiative Ocean Bottom Seismometers

Abstract: Physical sources of high-frequency seismic noise in the ocean are investigated using data from the Cascadia Initiative (CI) ocean bottom seismometer (OBS) network, hindcasts of wind speed, waves, and the bottom currents predicted by a regional ocean circulation model and observed at sites on cabled observatories. Seismic data in the 5-12 Hz band are considered because it is best for detecting regional earthquakes and lies between the frequencies of local microseisms and the seasonal whale calls. Median noise l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from these high amplitude events, which contain most of the seismic signal's power, the seismic frequency spectra for all three axes (Northward, Eastward, upward) are dominated by the main tidal frequency constituents. Higher frequency constituents can be found in the domain of the ambient seismic noise (Hilmo & Wilcock, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from these high amplitude events, which contain most of the seismic signal's power, the seismic frequency spectra for all three axes (Northward, Eastward, upward) are dominated by the main tidal frequency constituents. Higher frequency constituents can be found in the domain of the ambient seismic noise (Hilmo & Wilcock, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no significant preference at particular hours ( p s = 0.20), something that is rather expected in an oceanic environment in the absence of anthropogenic noise, predominantly present during daytime in continental areas. Note, however, that the fact that detection level may be correlated with the tides cannot be ruled out (e.g., Hilmo & Wilcock, 2020). Nevertheless, we estimated that M C fluctuated between −0.34 to −0.05 during different tidal phase ranges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After normalizing the seismic records to a uniform sensitivity, continuous spectrograms were constructed for each station using a 2-s Hanning window with 80% overlap ( Fig 2A–2C ). Because the 50-Hz sampling frequency of the majority of the OBSs was insufficient to record the high-amplitude third harmonic of the B call and many of the instruments sampling at higher sampling rates were noisy at high frequencies [ 28 ], detections were based on just the first harmonic. The detection kernel ( Fig 2D ) was constructed from representative calls and comprises a single tone that sweeps down linearly from 15.7 Hz to 14.4 Hz over 10 s with a bandwidth of 0.5 Hz.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%