2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2015.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical structure of point-like interactions for one-dimensional Schrödinger operator and the gauge symmetry

Abstract: We consider physical interpretations of non-trivial boundary conditions of self-adjoint extensions for one-dimensional Schrödinger operator of free spinless particle. Despite its model and rather abstract character this question is worth of investigation due to application for one-dimensional nanostructures. The main result is the physical interpretation of peculiar self-adjoint extension with discontinuity of both the probability density and the derivative of the wave function. We show that this case differs … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with the spin-momentum nature of the r-couplings the physical reason of such factorization is that X 3 contact interaction does not include spatial inhomogeneity in electric field potential ϕ. This is quite consistent with the difference between X 2 and X 3 from the point of view of breaking the gauge symmetry [14,17].…”
Section: Contact Interactions For Spin 1/2 Casesupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In accordance with the spin-momentum nature of the r-couplings the physical reason of such factorization is that X 3 contact interaction does not include spatial inhomogeneity in electric field potential ϕ. This is quite consistent with the difference between X 2 and X 3 from the point of view of breaking the gauge symmetry [14,17].…”
Section: Contact Interactions For Spin 1/2 Casesupporting
confidence: 64%
“…layered system. The only demand consistent with the hermiticity of the Hamiltonian (1) is the conservation of current components (14).…”
Section: Contact Interactions For Spin 1/2 Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(16), however, for this type we assume that the limit sin(kr) → 0 proceeds faster (as a function of l 1 , l 2 ) than in the asymptotic representation (18). The limit diagonal elements λ 11 and λ 22 are given in this case by the same formulae (19).…”
Section: Three Types Of Resonant-tunneling Point Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the sets (21) and (22), the asymptotic formulae (24) provide the finiteness of the arguments of the trigonometric functions in Eqs. (5) - (8), so that all the expressions (14) - (19) can be used in the following in the parametrized form. Thus, the resonance condition (14) can be rewritten as…”
Section: Sets Of the Existence Of The Distribution δ ′ (X)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already mentioned in Section 1, neither δ ′ nor δ (1) stand for a "genuine" derivative of a δ interaction-they simply refer to particular choices of parameters in the general point interaction [34][35][36] (a recent proposal for physically interpreting the boundary conditions given by single point interactions is given in Kulinskii and Panchenko [58]). …”
Section: Double Barrier Of Generalized Point Interactions: Symmetry Umentioning
confidence: 99%