“…In this analysis, the exemplar was determined from the reviewed articles to maintain the analysts' neutrality. Rodgers (2000) warned analysts not to introduce personal biases by creating or Fatigue and pain (Cody et al, 2021;Han et al, 2021;Pujasari et al, 2021;Redman et al, 2018;Sabin et al, 2020;Sun-Suslow et al, 2022;Voss et al, 2021) Reduced neurocognitive functions (Alikhani et al, 2020;Azimi et al, 2020;Campbell et al, 2019;De Francesco et al, 2021c;González-Tomé et al, 2018;Mahmood et al, 2018) Reduced health outcome and quality of life (Campbell et al, 2019;Downing et al, 2020;Pujasari et al, 2021;Rogers et al, 2020Rogers et al, , 2021Zhang et al, 2021) Poor ARV therapy adherence (Abdu & Dule, 2020;Chaponda et al, 2018;Downing et al, 2020;Pujasari et al, 2021) Day time sleepiness (Milinkovic et al, 2020;Redman et al, 2018;Thorarinsdottir et al, 2019) Depression, anxiety, and maladaptive coping (Cody et al, 2021;Huang et al, 2021;Sun-Suslow et al, 2022) Increased diseases progression and cardiovascular mortality (Gutierrez et al, 2019) Social phobia, living arrangement, sexual dysfunction selecting an exemplar that best represented the analysts' interests. Although multiple exemplars seem beneficial for clarity, locating an appropriate exemplar is not always easy (Rodgers, 2000).…”