2015
DOI: 10.2136/sssaspecpub49.c7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Tests for Monitoring Soil Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
169
2
52

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 261 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
169
2
52
Order By: Relevance
“…Across rotations and tillage treatments, the average BD was the smallest in the surface 0 to 10 cm (1.27 Mg m −3 ). Despite the differences, all BD values are less than values considered root‐inhibiting in silt loam and silty clay loam soils (Arshad et al, 1996).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Across rotations and tillage treatments, the average BD was the smallest in the surface 0 to 10 cm (1.27 Mg m −3 ). Despite the differences, all BD values are less than values considered root‐inhibiting in silt loam and silty clay loam soils (Arshad et al, 1996).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This can result in shallow plant rooting and poor plant growth, which affects crop yield reduces vegetative cover available to protect soil from erosion. Compaction leads to increased runoff and erosion on sloping land and can create water logging on flatter areas (Arshad, Lowery, & Grossman, 1996).…”
Section: Soil Bdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were first sieved with a 2-mm mesh to remove debris and stones. Soil texture was determined by a texture-by-feel test (Arshad, Lowery, & Grossman, 1996). Soil pH was determined on undried soil by making a 1:1 volume:volume slurry of soil and deionized water, pH measurements were taken every 15 min for approximately 60 min, or until readings remained stable through time (Van Lierop & MacKenzie, 1977).…”
Section: Habitat Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%