2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2203.10594
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physically Interpretable Machine Learning for nuclear masses

M. R. Mumpower,
T. M. Sprouse,
A. E. Lovell
et al.

Abstract: We present a novel approach to modeling the ground state mass of atomic nuclei based directly on a probabilistic neural network constrained by relevant physics. Our Physically Interpretable Machine Learning (PIML) approach incorporates knowledge of physics by using a physically motivated feature space in addition to a soft physics constraint that is implemented as a penalty to the loss function.We train our PIML model on a random set of ∼20% of the Atomic Mass Evaluation (AME) and predict the remaining ∼80%. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above discussions outline the major impact of uncertain nuclear physics inputs on the actinide production in merger ejecta. Further development in nuclear theory modeling, e.g., [79][80][81][82][83][84], will continue to improve our understanding in this aspect. In the next section, we will discuss how they can possibly leave imprints on kilonova emission of BNSMs.…”
Section: Theory Requirements and Nuclear Physics Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above discussions outline the major impact of uncertain nuclear physics inputs on the actinide production in merger ejecta. Further development in nuclear theory modeling, e.g., [79][80][81][82][83][84], will continue to improve our understanding in this aspect. In the next section, we will discuss how they can possibly leave imprints on kilonova emission of BNSMs.…”
Section: Theory Requirements and Nuclear Physics Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%