2006
DOI: 10.1097/01367895-200617020-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physician Assistant Program Director Opinions Regarding the Importance of Faculty Research and Publication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally PA faculty may be ill-prepared by virtue of their training or the workload expectations of combined clinical-teaching practice to find time to engage in work required academic pursuits such as research and publication. Barriers to publication by PA faculty include time, resources, and support (Coniglio & Colletti, 2006;Hegmann & Dehn, 2006); and in a recent study Hegmann (2008) reported that almost three-quarters of all PA faculty had no peer-reviewed publications over the length of their careers. In a survey of PA academic leadership (deans and program directors) 58.7% of respondents rated scholarly activity as important for promotion considerations and 74.7% rated research and publication important for the profession, but only 23% thought allowing more time for research and publication was important for retention of faculty (Hegmann & Dehn, 2006).…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally PA faculty may be ill-prepared by virtue of their training or the workload expectations of combined clinical-teaching practice to find time to engage in work required academic pursuits such as research and publication. Barriers to publication by PA faculty include time, resources, and support (Coniglio & Colletti, 2006;Hegmann & Dehn, 2006); and in a recent study Hegmann (2008) reported that almost three-quarters of all PA faculty had no peer-reviewed publications over the length of their careers. In a survey of PA academic leadership (deans and program directors) 58.7% of respondents rated scholarly activity as important for promotion considerations and 74.7% rated research and publication important for the profession, but only 23% thought allowing more time for research and publication was important for retention of faculty (Hegmann & Dehn, 2006).…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of PA faculty have been limited primarily to descriptive studies or bivariate correlations of PA faculty publishing patterns (Hegmann, 2008;Hegmann & Dehn, 2006; retirement intentions (Jones, Repka, Draper, & Orcutt, 2006), faculty benefits (Danielson, 2007) and burnout (Forister & Blessing, 2007). In a study of publishing history among doctorally prepared faculty, Orcutt and Gosdin (2005) did employ multiple regression analysis demonstrating that "years since degree awarded" and "total number of publications within one year of degree award" were positively related to total number of publications, and that their overall model "accounted for 68% of the variance in the total number of publications of PA faculty" (Orcutt & Gosdin, 2005, p 11).…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations