Physician communication coaching effects on patient experience

Abstract

BackgroundExcellent communication is a necessary component of high-quality health care. We aimed to determine whether a training module could improve patients’ perceptions of physician communication behaviors, as measured by change over time in domains of patient experience scores related to physician communication.Study designWe designed a comprehensive physician-training module focused on improving specific “etiquette-based” physician communication skills through standardized simulations and physician coaching with structured feedback. We employed a quasi-experimental pre-post design, with an intervention group consisting of internal medicine hospitalists and residents and a control group consisting of surgeons. The outcome was percent “always” scores for questions related to patients’ perceptions of physician communication using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey and a Non-HCAHPS Physician-Specific Patient Experience Survey (NHPPES) administered to patients cared for by hospitalists.ResultsA total of 128 physicians participated in the simulation. Responses from 5020 patients were analyzed using HCAHPS survey data and 1990 patients using NHPPES survey data. The intercept shift, or the degree of change from pre-intervention percent “always” responses, for the HCAHPS questions of doctors “treating patients with courtesy” “explaining things in a way patients could understand,” and “overall teamwork” showed no significant differences between surgical control and hospitalist intervention patients. Adjusted NHPPES percent excellent survey results increased significantly post-intervention for the questions of specified individual doctors “keeping patient informed” (adjusted intercept shift 9.9% P = 0.019), “overall teamwork” (adjusted intercept shift 11%, P = 0.037), and “using words the patient could understand” (adjusted intercept shift 14.8%, p = 0.001).ConclusionA simulation based physician communication coaching method focused on specific “etiquette-based” communication behaviors through a deliberate practice framework was not associated with significantly improved HCAHPS physician communication patient experience scores. Further research could reveal ways that this model affects patients’ perceptions of physician communication relating to specific physicians or behaviors.

Caregivers’ misperception of the severity of hip fractures

“… 24 It has been demonstrated that an open and sincere dialog between the people involved in the patient’s management improves the functional outcome of many pathologies, including those involving rehabilitation. 25 – 29 However, few studies have tried to propose communication strategies and appropriate training to guide doctors to effective, empathic, and patient-centered communication, 30 , 31 so the relationship between the doctor, patient, and his/her social network is still strongly dependent on their subjective tendencies and respective capacities for empathic relationships.…”

Can specific feedback improve patients’ satisfaction with hospitalist physicians? A feasibility study using a validated tool to assess inpatient satisfaction

“…The current body of literature suggests that a multi-faceted approach that includes elements of communication skills training, real-time feedback, and coaching is ideal. 14 Efforts that are sustained over time 12 and that address all clinical providers who influence patient satisfaction (i.e. residents, advanced practice providers and consulting physicians) have also met with success.…”

From intention to action: A systematic literature review of provider behaviour change‐focused interventions in physical health and behavioural health settings

“…The target intervention population for 18 studies were doctors, and predominantly primary care providers/general practitioners. 26,28,34,35,37,39,46,47,49,50,55,56,[58][59][60][65][66][67] To be included and eligible to participate in an intervention, primary care providers often needed to treat a specific subset of patients in their practice. For example, Presseau et al focused on general practitioners who provided care to patients with type 2 diabetes across 44 general practices through a national cohort study.…”