Physician reentry–A timely topic for emergency medicine

Guth, Todd; Luber, Samuel D.; Marcolini, Evie G.; Lo, Bruce M.

doi:10.1002/emp2.12317

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It becomes apparent that by facilitating the return of health-care professionals, the NHS may promote staff retention, reduce recruitment costs and enhance the quality of patient care (Bower et al , 2010; Burns et al , 2006; Guth et al , 2020). Current organisational strategies have, however, focused less on the integration of returners as a potential strategy for minimising the burden of the workforce crisis (NHS England, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The efficacy of psychoeducation to improve personal skills and well-being among health-care professionals returning to clinical practice: a pilot pre-post study

Szekely,

Mazreku,

Bignell

et al. 2024

JMHTEP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Many health-care professionals leave clinical practice temporarily or permanently. Interventions designed to facilitate the return of health-care professionals fail to consider returners’ psychosocial needs despite their importance for patient care. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a psychoeducational intervention in improving personal skills and well-being among UK-based health-care professionals returning to clinical practice. Design/methodology/approach In total, 20 health-care professionals took part in the one-day intervention and completed measures of demographics, self-efficacy, positive attitudes towards work and perceived job resources before and after the intervention. A baseline comparison group of 18 health-care professionals was also recruited. Findings Significant associations were detected between return-to-work stage and study group. Following the intervention, participants reported improvements in self-efficacy and, generally, perceived more job resources, whereas positive attitudes towards work decreased. While none of these changes were significant, the intervention was deemed acceptable by participants. This study provides modest but promising evidence for the role of psychoeducation as a tool in supporting the psychosocial needs of returning health-care professionals. Research limitations/implications Additional research is needed to clarify the reliability of intervention effects, its effectiveness compared to alternative interventions, and the impact across different subgroups of returning health-care professionals. Practical implications Return-to-practice interventions should address the psychosocial needs of health-care professionals in terms of their personal skills and well-being. Psychoeducation can increase self-efficacy and perceptions of job resources among returning health-care professionals. Originality/value This study sheds light on a relatively understudied, but fundamental area – the psychosocial challenges of health-care professionals returning to clinical practice – and further justifies the need for tailored interventions.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%