2014
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physician‐reported barriers to referring cancer patients to specialists: Prevalence, factors, and association with career satisfaction

Abstract: Background Quality care for patients with cancer often requires access to specialty providers, but little is known about barriers to referring cancer patients for specialized care. Referral barriers may also lessen physician career satisfaction. We aimed to determine factors associated with these barriers and whether greater barriers are associated with low career satisfaction. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we studied 1,562 primary care physicians (PCPs) and 2,144 specialists responding to the multi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our survey of 827 recent and seasoned first‐opinion veterinarians from 17 countries illustrated that most participants discussed referral of atopic dogs and cats with clients, yet the method or avidity of recommendations may vary. In human medicine, investigators commonly perform studies to identify clinician and patient barriers to referral, as well as physician perceptions about referral and treatment options 20–26 . Similar to our findings, these studies have identified the following commonly noted referral barriers: perceived high cost, long travel times, delayed communication and disagreement over the specialist's role 20–26 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Our survey of 827 recent and seasoned first‐opinion veterinarians from 17 countries illustrated that most participants discussed referral of atopic dogs and cats with clients, yet the method or avidity of recommendations may vary. In human medicine, investigators commonly perform studies to identify clinician and patient barriers to referral, as well as physician perceptions about referral and treatment options 20–26 . Similar to our findings, these studies have identified the following commonly noted referral barriers: perceived high cost, long travel times, delayed communication and disagreement over the specialist's role 20–26 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Efforts such as implementation of surgical quality improvement programs, care coordination, or streamlining referral systems to centers of excellence that improve access to high-quality care could lower early postoperative mortality in this group of patients. 13,25 In addition, patients with rectal cancer require specialized management, and centralizing care could improve postoperative outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16,18 The human medical field has long recognized the need to scrutinize clinician and patient factors in order to smooth out the referral process and make certain therapies more readily available to patients. [12][13][14][19][20][21][22][23] Findings from studies such as these have been used to improve the specialist-generalist relationship, provide better continuity of care and ensure better patient outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 In an effort to better support clients during diagnostic trials, one study investigated client factors associated with adherence to elimination diet trials based on the Health Belief Model commonly used in human medicine. 13 Physicians have long recognized the need to investigate perceived barriers to referral and specialized treatment which can include specialty services with restricted provider networks, inconvenient office hours, and difficulty in getting an appointment quickly. [14][15][16] To the best of the authors' knowledge, specific factors impacting referral to specialized veterinary medicine have not been evaluated in the veterinary dermatology subset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%