Physician Use of Empathy During Clinical Practice (S813)

Comer, Amber; Ustymchuk, Nina; D’Cruz, Lynn; Bartlett, Stephanie; Fettig, Lyle

doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.12.266

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For instance, descriptive ethics studies explore stakeholders’ responses to bioethical questions and try explain how people arrive at certain moral opinions and reasoning patterns [ 13 – 22 ]. Empirical research can investigate whether people and healthcare professionals comply with ethical guidelines and how ethical solutions are translated into practice [ 13 – 15 , 18 , 23 – 29 ]. Furthermore, empirical research reveals the lived experience of stakeholders [ 14 , 30 – 34 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Acceptable objectives of empirical research in bioethics: a qualitative exploration of researchers’ views

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background This is the first qualitative study to investigate how researchers, who do empirical work in bioethics, relate to objectives of empirical research in bioethics (ERiB). We explore reasons that make some objectives more acceptable, while others are deemed less acceptable. Methods Using qualitative exploratory study design, we interviewed bioethics researchers, who were selected to represent different types of scholars working in the field. The interview data of 25 participants were analyzed in this paper using thematic analysis. Results From the eight objectives presented to the study participants, understanding the context of a bioethical issue and identifying ethical issues in practice received unanimous agreement. Participants also supported other objectives of ERiB but with varying degrees of agreement. The most contested objectives were striving to draw normative recommendations and developing and justifying moral principles. The is-ought gap was not considered an obstacle to ERiB, but rather a warning sign to critically reflect on the normative implications of empirical results. Conclusions Our results show that the most contested objectives are also the more ambitious ones, whereas the least contested ones focus on producing empirical results. The potential of empirical research to be useful for bioethics was mostly based on the reasoning pattern that empirical data can provide a testing ground for elements of normative theory. Even though empirical research can inform many parts of bioethical inquiry, normative expertise is recommended to guide ERiB. The acceptability of ambitious objectives for ERiB boils down to finding firm ground for the integration of empirical facts in normative inquiry.

show abstract