2018
DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicians’ views on patient participation in choice of oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation—a qualitative study

Abstract: Direct oral anticoagulants provide an alternative to vitamin K antagonists for the anticoagulation therapy in atrial fibrillation (AF). The availability of several treatment options with different attributes makes shared decision-making appropriate for the choice of anticoagulation therapy. The aim of this study was to understand how physicians choose an oral anticoagulant (OAC) for patients with AF and how physicians view patients' participation in this decision. Semi-structured interviews with 17 Finnish phy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14] Ten studies were high quality in relation to the majority (five or more) of the nine graded fields of the qualitative CASP checklist. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Poorly described facets included the relationship between researcher and participant; [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][25][26][27][28][29] explanation of the study to participants and handling of their data; [17, 19-21, 23-25, 27-29] rigour of data analysis [18-23, 25, 27-29] and appropriateness of recruitment strategies. [19,21,22,25,[27][28][29] For further details of study quality see S2 Table in S1 File.…”
Section: Study Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[14] Ten studies were high quality in relation to the majority (five or more) of the nine graded fields of the qualitative CASP checklist. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Poorly described facets included the relationship between researcher and participant; [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][25][26][27][28][29] explanation of the study to participants and handling of their data; [17, 19-21, 23-25, 27-29] rigour of data analysis [18-23, 25, 27-29] and appropriateness of recruitment strategies. [19,21,22,25,[27][28][29] For further details of study quality see S2 Table in S1 File.…”
Section: Study Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were included from at least 248 clinicians. Included studies were conducted in the UK, [19,21,22,24] Finland, [29] Australia, [17,20,27] the USA [18,23,25,26] and Canada. [28] Participating clinicians were from primary, [17, 19, 20, 22-25, 28, 29] secondary [18-21, 23, 25, 26, 28, 29] and tertiary care.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations